Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals

["Harald Beyer-Arnesen" <haraldba@xxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "\"Ryan H. B. Graham\"" <ryan.graham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 29. januar 2003 15.36
Subject: Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals


> A quick question,
>
> I have found this thread very interesting and important - but due to the
sheer
> number of posts and my lack of time to read them all - I missed out on
what the
> popular abbreviation "Pol." refers to.  Could someone help me out -
possibly
> point me to a particular post in the archive.  Thanks
>
> CGs
> Ryan (loyal lurker)

I tempted to say that it an expression of those widespread US
diseases, sloppy language and abbreviation inflation combined
with political sectarian code language, but I pretty sure it simple
means "political". The urge for writing "political" with a capital P
I suspect is somehow related to the reduction of the "proletarian
camp/milieu"  to a few hundred people on a global basis (under
a fierce attack by parasites and freemasonry according to some),
making  up the idealistically postulated embryo of the future Party,
also with a capital P. In other words, we are on the terrain of
theology.
    I hope Sean can appreciate this critique.

What I have not figured out yet however is what "cdes" is
supposed to mean apart from it not being a reference to
compact discs.

Politics is also about communication. An speaking in code
language generally is a sign of semi-religious selfconfinement.
It is not healthy.

Harald

> Quoting neil <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Scott, Chris and Herald, et al,
> >
> > Hasty reply before crashing --
> >
> > Scott,  I guess each city has some pol. differences in the
> > existing  leftist/reformist/li-lab anti- war coalitions-operations.  In
> > general
> > attendance only makes sense if these things draw fresh , honest
> > people looking  oppose all  capitalists and their wars and plunder
> > are drawn to them..
> > The liberal-labs and the state cap groups dominant there are not for
this,
> > the lib-labs want the Democrats/churchmen  to get firm control
> > of things so as  US capital does not  really get hurt.  , the state caps
> > have other capitalist  regimes abroad they want to vouch for, etc,
> > really their 'models of socialism / workers states, etc..
> >
> > But just some general stuff we have learned, if you are
> > going to these with communist politics/literature to debate, question
,etc.
> > This stuff needs to be planned , these coalition gurus are pros
> > at  conjuring up ways to stifle revolutionaries and 'isolate' them' -
> > plan ahead of time with  a couple key points you  want to make  -
> > fire away if you get the 2 mins chance, don't get intimidated,
> > etc-- expect to get sandbagged and/or  also face a flurry of pol.
garbage.
> >
> > Chris W. /Herald.  --In Motions,  There is obviously   healthy and
> > deepening
> > skepticism, with more , so-called 'moral' outrage  with many
> > American working  people about the  coming blitzkreig
> > planned  by US and this  is driving people into social /mass
> > actions, many for the first time., maybe the 'great powers'
> > own contradictions over Oil, markets,  and spheres of influence, etc
> > will boil up faster now,   and these will  but stall  the impending US
> > attack for a  few months? In any case , this is good arena amongst the
> > ordinary people for communists to make friends and contacts
> > with future allies in bigger class and social confrontations.  communist
> > ideas have to preve their relevnacy in all this too -- not just in
theory,
> > but cdes, in Pol. practice as well.
> > Be on guard as US will be pushing 'support our troops'  ideological
> > campaign very wide , very soon I would think , and as in 1991 , it will
> >  have a telling -chilling effect on a lot of people who see themselves
now
> > as anti-war. Exposing this is a key job  for communists, I would think.
> >
> > neil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---