aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals
- Subject: Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals
- From: "\\\"Ryan H. B. Graham\\\"" <ryan.graham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:36:18 -0500
A quick question,
I have found this thread very interesting and important - but due to the sheer
number of posts and my lack of time to read them all - I missed out on what the
popular abbreviation "Pol." refers to. Could someone help me out - possibly
point me to a particular post in the archive. Thanks
CGs
Ryan (loyal lurker)
Quoting neil <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Scott, Chris and Herald, et al,
>
> Hasty reply before crashing --
>
> Scott, I guess each city has some pol. differences in the
> existing leftist/reformist/li-lab anti- war coalitions-operations. In
> general
> attendance only makes sense if these things draw fresh , honest
> people looking oppose all capitalists and their wars and plunder
> are drawn to them..
> The liberal-labs and the state cap groups dominant there are not for this,
> the lib-labs want the Democrats/churchmen to get firm control
> of things so as US capital does not really get hurt. , the state caps
> have other capitalist regimes abroad they want to vouch for, etc,
> really their 'models of socialism / workers states, etc..
>
> But just some general stuff we have learned, if you are
> going to these with communist politics/literature to debate, question ,etc.
> This stuff needs to be planned , these coalition gurus are pros
> at conjuring up ways to stifle revolutionaries and 'isolate' them' -
> plan ahead of time with a couple key points you want to make -
> fire away if you get the 2 mins chance, don't get intimidated,
> etc-- expect to get sandbagged and/or also face a flurry of pol. garbage.
>
> Chris W. /Herald. --In Motions, There is obviously healthy and
> deepening
> skepticism, with more , so-called 'moral' outrage with many
> American working people about the coming blitzkreig
> planned by US and this is driving people into social /mass
> actions, many for the first time., maybe the 'great powers'
> own contradictions over Oil, markets, and spheres of influence, etc
> will boil up faster now, and these will but stall the impending US
> attack for a few months? In any case , this is good arena amongst the
> ordinary people for communists to make friends and contacts
> with future allies in bigger class and social confrontations. communist
> ideas have to preve their relevnacy in all this too -- not just in theory,
> but cdes, in Pol. practice as well.
> Be on guard as US will be pushing 'support our troops' ideological
> campaign very wide , very soon I would think , and as in 1991 , it will
> have a telling -chilling effect on a lot of people who see themselves now
> as anti-war. Exposing this is a key job for communists, I would think.
>
> neil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals, (continued)
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Chris Wright Mon 27 Jan 2003, 16:13 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Scott Hamilton Mon 27 Jan 2003, 16:37 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Chris Wright Mon 27 Jan 2003, 17:47 GMT
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Wed 29 Jan 2003, 07:47 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
\\\"Ryan H. B. Graham\\\" Wed 29 Jan 2003, 14:36 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
\\\"Ryan H. B. Graham\\\" Wed 29 Jan 2003, 15:02 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Harald Beyer-Arnesen Wed 29 Jan 2003, 15:34 GMT
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Thu 30 Jan 2003, 05:26 GMT
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Thu 30 Jan 2003, 05:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]