aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
AUT: ANSWER and the liberals
Scott, Chris and Herald, et al,
Hasty reply before crashing --
Scott, I guess each city has some pol. differences in the
existing leftist/reformist/li-lab anti- war coalitions-operations. In
general
attendance only makes sense if these things draw fresh , honest
people looking oppose all capitalists and their wars and plunder
are drawn to them..
The liberal-labs and the state cap groups dominant there are not for this,
the lib-labs want the Democrats/churchmen to get firm control
of things so as US capital does not really get hurt. , the state caps
have other capitalist regimes abroad they want to vouch for, etc,
really their 'models of socialism / workers states, etc..
But just some general stuff we have learned, if you are
going to these with communist politics/literature to debate, question ,etc.
This stuff needs to be planned , these coalition gurus are pros
at conjuring up ways to stifle revolutionaries and 'isolate' them' -
plan ahead of time with a couple key points you want to make -
fire away if you get the 2 mins chance, don't get intimidated,
etc-- expect to get sandbagged and/or also face a flurry of pol. garbage.
Chris W. /Herald. --In Motions, There is obviously healthy and
deepening
skepticism, with more , so-called 'moral' outrage with many
American working people about the coming blitzkreig
planned by US and this is driving people into social /mass
actions, many for the first time., maybe the 'great powers'
own contradictions over Oil, markets, and spheres of influence, etc
will boil up faster now, and these will but stall the impending US
attack for a few months? In any case , this is good arena amongst the
ordinary people for communists to make friends and contacts
with future allies in bigger class and social confrontations. communist
ideas have to preve their relevnacy in all this too -- not just in theory,
but cdes, in Pol. practice as well.
Be on guard as US will be pushing 'support our troops' ideological
campaign very wide , very soon I would think , and as in 1991 , it will
have a telling -chilling effect on a lot of people who see themselves now
as anti-war. Exposing this is a key job for communists, I would think.
neil
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Mon 27 Jan 2003, 03:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Chris Wright Mon 27 Jan 2003, 16:13 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Scott Hamilton Mon 27 Jan 2003, 16:37 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Chris Wright Mon 27 Jan 2003, 17:47 GMT
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Wed 29 Jan 2003, 07:47 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
\\\"Ryan H. B. Graham\\\" Wed 29 Jan 2003, 14:36 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
\\\"Ryan H. B. Graham\\\" Wed 29 Jan 2003, 15:02 GMT
- Re: AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
Harald Beyer-Arnesen Wed 29 Jan 2003, 15:34 GMT
- AUT: ANSWER and the liberals,
neil Thu 30 Jan 2003, 05:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]