AUT: Re: unions against the war??

["Laura Fiocco" <fiocco@xxxxxxxxx>]

what are you talking about? Using anti-war movement for any kind of
settarian target it's simply foolish. Anti-war movement stays at the core of
bio-power: the larger it is, the better. Anti-vietnam war teaches.
ciao laura
----- Original Message -----
From: "neil" <74742.1651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "autopsy" <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:38 AM
Subject: AUT: unions against the war??


> Scott--
>
> Yes , your description of pol. scenarios of unions
> participation in  anti-war actions is  accurate - esp. about the
> drowning out of workers interests behind "popular front'  schemes
> of the lib-labs, church community, PB domination  etc. who sow the worst
> illusions
> in a 'peaceful' and non-violent capitalism, election circuses, etc.
>
> This is no doubt that  is going on here , but new  active trends of
> of self-organized worker  protestors  for class organization  against
> capital
> and its wars have yet to be re-born.
> Yes, the communists should also be inside this motion , challenging
> the hegemony of the lib-labs , labor fakers,  etc , using props-agit to
> expose what
> is going on , talking to workers, linking up the hatred of  capitalist
wars
> to all the huge austerity cuts.
>
> I will check out that web page on the ILWU  contract soon.
>
> thanks
> Neil
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---