aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly
- Subject: Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly
- From: "cwright" <cwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:39:45 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C27437.2D5F9FA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Lowe, I will forward the suggestion on. I do believe that part =
of the problem is a lack of familiarity with the D+G type of language =
and style, which Negri has obviously partially adopted, and that is why =
my friend was looking for something in somewhat 'plainer' English. He =
is in his 60's and is not really ready at this point to spend a few =
years learning the whole style which he finds quite unpleasant compared =
to Spinoza (which I find funny), which may limit him and which he is =
aware of that. It is mostly because I have poked and prodded him to =
take this up because of his much greater familiarity with Spinoza that =
he is doing it at all. So in the end, it is my fault.
Cheers,
Chris=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Lowe Laclau=20
To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly
Chris,=20
I do not know of any secondary critiques of the book, but I find that =
Negri himself is usually pretty good at explaining his interpretation. I =
cannot think of an interview or book that he's written that has not =
mentioned Spinoza. His reding evidently changed his entire perspective =
of the political. I have read the book and find it very nice as a work =
of Spinozan scholarship and historiography as well as a novel reading of =
Spinoza's work as a whole. It is not for those who enjoy light leisurly =
reading however, and can be quite dry (as dry as Deleuze's early =
dissertation if not more so) if you do not have a deep interest in the =
annals and development of this brand of philosophy. However, if you do =
read it and give it the time to understand it, it is extremely =
rewarding.=20
The ne article he wrote, i believe it is 'Spinoza's Antimodernity' =
(which you can perhaps find on the web) is also very good at summarizing =
his interpretation. =20
Lowe
>From: cwright=20
>Reply-To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
>To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
>Subject: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly=20
>Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:30:05 -0500=20
>=20
>Does anyone know of useful explications of Negri's arguments in The =
Savage Anomaly? That is, not just rehashes, but actual work which tries =
to analyze what he means. Rehashes are easy enough to find, but =
explanations and analyses are less so. This is for a friend working =
through Negri's work on Spinoza.=20
>=20
>Thanks in advance,=20
>Chris=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C27437.2D5F9FA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks Lowe, I will forward the =
suggestion=20
on. I do believe that part of the problem is a lack of familiarity =
with=20
the D+G type of language and style, which Negri has obviously partially =
adopted,=20
and that is why my friend was looking for something in somewhat =
'plainer'=20
English. He is in his 60's and is not really ready at this point =
to spend=20
a few years learning the whole style which he finds quite unpleasant =
compared to=20
Spinoza (which I find funny), which may limit him and which he is aware =
of=20
that. It is mostly because I have poked and prodded him to take =
this up=20
because of his much greater familiarity with Spinoza that he is doing it =
at=20
all. So in the end, it is my fault.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cheers,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Chris</FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dlowelaclau@xxxxxxxxxxx =
href=3D"mailto:lowelaclau@xxxxxxxxxxx">Lowe=20
Laclau</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
title=3Daut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
=
href=3D"mailto:aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx">aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxx=
age.virginia.edu</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, October 15, 2002 =
9:30=20
AM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: AUT: Explications =
of The=20
Savage Anomaly</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<P><BR><BR></P>Chris, </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<P>I do not know of any secondary critiques of the book, but I find =
that Negri=20
himself is usually pretty good at explaining his interpretation. I =
cannot=20
think of an interview or book that he's written that has not mentioned =
Spinoza. His reding evidently changed his entire perspective of the =
political.=20
I have read the book and find it very nice as a work of Spinozan =
scholarship=20
and historiography as well as a novel reading of Spinoza's work as a =
whole. It=20
is not for those who enjoy light leisurly reading however, and can be =
quite=20
dry (as dry as Deleuze's early dissertation if not more so) if you do =
not have=20
a deep interest in the annals and development of this brand of =
philosophy.=20
However, if you do read it and give it the time to understand it, it =
is=20
extremely rewarding. </P>
<P>The ne article he wrote, i believe it is 'Spinoza's Antimodernity' =
(which=20
you can perhaps find on the web) is also very good at summarizing his=20
interpretation. </P>
<P>Lowe</P>
<P>>From: cwright <CWRIGHT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx></P>
<DIV></DIV>>Reply-To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
<DIV></DIV>>To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=20
<DIV></DIV>>Subject: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly=20
<DIV></DIV>>Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:30:05 -0500=20
<DIV></DIV>>=20
<DIV></DIV>>Does anyone know of useful explications of Negri's =
arguments in=20
The Savage Anomaly? That is, not just rehashes, but actual work which =
tries to=20
analyze what he means. Rehashes are easy enough to find, but =
explanations and=20
analyses are less so. This is for a friend working through Negri's =
work on=20
Spinoza.=20
<DIV></DIV>>=20
<DIV></DIV>>Thanks in advance,=20
<DIV></DIV>>Chris=20
<DIV></DIV></DIV><BR clear=3Dall>
<HR>
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: <A=20
href=3D"http://g.msn.com/1HM1ENUS/c144??PS=3D47575">Click =
Here</A><BR>--- from=20
list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- =
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C27437.2D5F9FA0--
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
cwright Mon 14 Oct 2002, 20:46 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
Scott Hamilton Mon 14 Oct 2002, 23:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
topp8564 Tue 15 Oct 2002, 00:38 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
Lowe Laclau Tue 15 Oct 2002, 14:30 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
cwright Tue 15 Oct 2002, 15:39 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
Nate Holdren Tue 15 Oct 2002, 17:01 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
Tahir Wood Wed 16 Oct 2002, 07:01 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
cwright Wed 16 Oct 2002, 14:35 GMT
- Re: AUT: Explications of The Savage Anomaly,
Nate Holdren Wed 16 Oct 2002, 17:40 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]