Re: AUT: Fwd: The Gathering Storm?

["cwright" <cwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sad confirmation of Michael's stuff.  Too bad, it might have been
interesting material.

                      Tennenbaum advocated a plan devised by EIR
                      founder American economist Lyndon LaRouche. The
reactions
                      of many of the Russians at the Congress to LaRouche
were
                      not unlike reactions I have seen in America. I share a
near
                      universal respect of the La Rouche organization's
detailed
                      and precise research. I have not, however, always
agreed
                      with EIR conclusions. (La Rouche is a staunch drug
warrior
                      while FTW favors decriminalization.) I chuckled when a
Russian
                      banker leaned over during the presentation and
quipped,
                      "Oh no, not the Queen again." This referred to
                      a perception that LaRouche believes that the British
royal
                      family is the root of all economic evil. However,
Tennenbaum
                      held complete attention when he spoke. He drew some
audible
                      "Ahas!" by explaining that the Y2K non-event was,
                      in reality, a faked crisis permitting the Federal
Reserve
                      to transfer massive amounts of cash into the banking
system
                      without raising suspicion. [I am grateful for his
translations
                      on the second day of the conference.]
                      Five aspects of the LaRouche
                      plan made obvious good sense. First, the plan calls
for
                      a return to a Bretton Woods format for monetary
policy.
                      The plan also includes the objective of restoring the
concepts
                      of "common good" and national sovereignty to policy
                      making, re-regulation of financial markets, freezing
and/or cancellation of claims connected with speculative debt and
                      the writing off of a major portion of international
debt
                      "in accordance with common benefit and moral
considerations."
Oy.  That's what I get for not keeping up with all the conspiracy theory
nuts.

Chris
"In a world which really is topsy-turvy, the true is a moment of the
false." - Debord
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Pugliese" <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: AUT: Fwd: The Gathering Storm?


>     Jeesh, Ruppert uses LaRouche as a valued source and Anthony Sutton
> who wrote, "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, " and,
> "Trilaterals Over Washington." That some listeners to the Pacifica
> Network and a few Indymedia sites use his work only shows how
> undertheorized some leftists conception of the power structure is. I
> expect this list to be way above such quacks.
> http://www.publiceye.org/Sucker_Punch/clues.html
> http://www.publiceye.org/b_conspi.html
> Michael Pugliese
>
> 7/23/02 5:51:16 AM, kersplebedeb <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >  Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:51:16 -0400
> >
> >  From:   kersplebedeb <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >  Subject:Re: AUT: Fwd: The Gathering Storm?
> >  To:     aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> >  hello all,
> >  i recently subscribed to this list, just in time to catch the
> discussion of
> >  A Gathering Storm, but not in time to get the actual article. Could
> somebody
> >  please forward it to me?
> >  I would be very interested in hearing more about what people have
> to say
> >  about Ruppert's analysis, as he is one of the big sources of
> conspiracy
> >  theories regarding September 11th to have been given a hearing in
> the left
> >  and radical left in North America.
> >  -k
> >
> >  Antagonism wrote:
> >
> >    T.O and Chris,
> >
> >     > I am more worried about the "bad is good for us" take. If we
> >
> >
> >      don't have a
> >      positive program, we shouldn't wait for the end of the world
> >      to makes us
> >      popular. That's an admission of defeat.
> >
> >
> >    huh?? "The Gathering Storm" article wan't 'marxiste' as Chris
> >    puts it. Nor was it saying bad is good. It's saying that the
> >    economy is being manipulated by bad people who are ripping
> >    ordinary americans off. 'Foreigners may end up owning american's
> >    homes!!!' it bleats. Its saying bad is bad, and that's because
> >    bad people are doing bad things. My personal view of the article
> >    is that its shot through with reactionary populist rhetoric and
> >    that makes me suspicious of its analysis.
> >
> >    T.O, you seem to think that trying to understand the economy and
> >    the crisis is itself a reactionary exercise, but then you also
> >    go on to complain about the economic crisis' bad effects.
> >
> >    Chris, I'm surprised that you, who are into Bonefeld and
> >    Holloway, who've written whole books about money, want to shut
> >    these questions down with just an insult.
> >
> >    I don't often post stuff to aut-op-sy, but when I do, I usually
> >    end up th
> >    inking "why do I bother?".
> >
> >    ho hum
> >
> >    Steve
> >
> >    __________________________________________________
> >    Do You Yahoo!?
> >    Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> >    from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> >    http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >         --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>




     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---