Re: AUT: Fwd: The Gathering Storm?

[Michael Pugliese <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Jeesh, Ruppert uses LaRouche as a valued source and Anthony Sutton
who wrote, "Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, " and,
"Trilaterals Over Washington." That some listeners to the Pacifica
Network and a few Indymedia sites use his work only shows how
undertheorized some leftists conception of the power structure is. I
expect this list to be way above such quacks.
http://www.publiceye.org/Sucker_Punch/clues.html
http://www.publiceye.org/b_conspi.html
Michael Pugliese

7/23/02 5:51:16 AM, kersplebedeb <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>  Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:51:16 -0400
>
>  From:   kersplebedeb <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  Subject:Re: AUT: Fwd: The Gathering Storm?
>  To:     aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>  hello all,
>  i recently subscribed to this list, just in time to catch the
discussion of
>  A Gathering Storm, but not in time to get the actual article. Could
somebody
>  please forward it to me?
>  I would be very interested in hearing more about what people have
to say
>  about Ruppert's analysis, as he is one of the big sources of
conspiracy
>  theories regarding September 11th to have been given a hearing in
the left
>  and radical left in North America.
>  -k
>
>  Antagonism wrote:
>
>    T.O and Chris,
>
>     > I am more worried about the "bad is good for us" take. If we
>
>
>      don't have a
>      positive program, we shouldn't wait for the end of the world
>      to makes us
>      popular. That's an admission of defeat.
>
>
>    huh?? "The Gathering Storm" article wan't 'marxiste' as Chris
>    puts it. Nor was it saying bad is good. It's saying that the
>    economy is being manipulated by bad people who are ripping
>    ordinary americans off. 'Foreigners may end up owning american's
>    homes!!!' it bleats. Its saying bad is bad, and that's because
>    bad people are doing bad things. My personal view of the article
>    is that its shot through with reactionary populist rhetoric and
>    that makes me suspicious of its analysis.
>
>    T.O, you seem to think that trying to understand the economy and
>    the crisis is itself a reactionary exercise, but then you also
>    go on to complain about the economic crisis' bad effects.
>
>    Chris, I'm surprised that you, who are into Bonefeld and
>    Holloway, who've written whole books about money, want to shut
>    these questions down with just an insult.
>
>    I don't often post stuff to aut-op-sy, but when I do, I usually
>    end up th
>    inking "why do I bother?".
>
>    ho hum
>
>    Steve
>
>    __________________________________________________
>    Do You Yahoo!?
>    Everything you'll ever need on one web page
>    from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
>    http://uk.my.yahoo.com
>
>
>         --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---





     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---