Re: AUT: cognitive mapping

["cwright" <cwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael,

Capital was a critique of political economy.  To the extent that capital's
minions read it as an economics text, as most post-Marx Marxism has done,
they have gotten nothing out of it.  Capital the book didn't give capital's
minions specific insights into the functioning and means of recuperating
revolt and revolutionaries.  Big difference from what is being talked about
here, regardless of whether or not anyone agrees or disagrees with the
cognitive mapping project.

Cheers,
Chris
"In a world which really is topsy-turvy, the true is a moment of the
false." - Debord

Miachael wrote:

> I'm finding a lot of these arguments against cognitive
> mapping, because it could help the ruling class, to be
> somewhat bizarre.
>
>
>
> By this logic, Marx shouldn't have written Capital,
> because Capital has been (generally speaking) more
> useful to the ruling class (up till now), than to the
> liberatory project.





     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---