aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
RE: Re: AUT: Empire
- Subject: RE: Re: AUT: Empire
- From: "michael pugliese" <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 22:06:08 -0800
http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/420/empire.html
>--- Original Message ---
>From: topp8564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Date: 2/25/02 3:09:25 AM
>
>The conservative article is at:
>
>http://www.firstthings.com/ftissues/ft0202/articles/anderson.html
>
>Some of it is hilarious: "the most pernicious books published
in recent memory"
>sounds like a sales pitch.
>
>Some of it is just plain lazy:
>
>"Empires pages brim with the sciencefictionlike neologisms that
typify much
>contemporary academic writing:agentic, biopower,
>deterritorializationwords that give those who wield them the
sense of gaining
>Shamanlike access to hidden realms."
>
>A lot of it, though, is just a silly ad-hominem on Negri, peppered
with such
>missives as "trade has grown by 1,600% since GATT" , not mentioning
the
>inequalities involved.
>
>This however, I thought made some sense:
>
>"If Hardt and Negris depiction of global capitalism is mendacious,
their hazy
>alternative to itabsolute democracy, open borders, equal compensationis
>apolitical utopian nonsense. How would such schemes actually
work? Hardt and
>Negri never say."
>
>The reviewer identified the books beaming optimism as its selling
point, and it
>is true, I think, that we were long overdue for a brash affirmation
of the left.
>But I think that at times this affirmation hasn't been very
well connected to
>present struggles - or at least the connection has not been
stated so clearly
>these conservatives could not misundertand it. Perhaps there
is no such
>formulation, and we should not worry... but maybe we're not
doing ourselves any
>favours. On this point, I suppose that authoritarian theocrats
aren't going to
>swallow the line that the capacity for freedom has to be acquired
by the
>exercise of freedom itself. But that's no excuse not to think
ahead.
>
>Thiago
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I couldn't get through to the the Coates review.
>
>Quoting michael pugliese <debsian@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>>
>>
>> Two new reviews. http://www.cpgb.org/worker/420/index.html
>> scroll down to Andrew Coates.
>> From the theo-cons on the Right, http://www.firstthings.com
>> current issue or previous.
>> Michael Pugliese
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------
>This mail sent through IMP: www-mail.usyd.edu.au
>
>
> --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- AUT: Empire in Space,
Peter van Heusden Mon 25 Feb 2002, 06:16 GMT
- Re: AUT: Fascism (Replies to Harald and Chris),
Peter Jovanovic Mon 25 Feb 2002, 04:09 GMT
- AUT: Empire,
michael pugliese Sun 24 Feb 2002, 23:22 GMT
- AUT: Re: machines and surplus value,
Harry M. Cleaver Sun 24 Feb 2002, 14:53 GMT
- AUT: Gemeinwesen,
Michael Handelman Sun 24 Feb 2002, 04:00 GMT
- AUT: The Dark Satanic Mills,
Patrick Lea Sat 23 Feb 2002, 13:34 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]