Re: AUT: "keynesian fascism" vs "neo-liberal fascism"

[topp8564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Quoting Nate Holdren <nateholdren@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Maybe I'm not using the terms the same way you are, but I don't equate
>
> neoliberal with anti-statist, which means I don't seen an opposition
> between
> fascism and neoliberalism (though I don't have a fully clear definition
> for
> fascism, which is why the present thread is so interesting to me). In
> the US
> Bush etc are not anti-statists, their
> anti-social-benefit-provision-via-the-state. They still want big
> military
> and police forces.

So, the neo-liberals are actually military "keynesians"? (Btw. I agree with
you neoliberalism is a cynical joke, this is one big reason for it)


-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: www-mail.usyd.edu.au


     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---