Re: AUT: re:Toni on Porto Alegre

["commie00" <commie00@xxxxxxxxx>]

> My guess is that you are valourising the
> (radical?)liberal side of the split by taking its lack
> of traditional class politics as some sort of implicit
> critique left critique of anti-imperialism and other
> features of the 'traditional' radical left. However, I
> can't really comment further until I have some hard
> evidence to comment on - why don't you post some
> docuemnts from the movement you talk about? If you had
> a discussion/planning list, then some emails from the
> archives would be good.

there is none because there wasn't one. as to other materials, nothing was
produced. it was all in-meeting fighting. however, given that my experience
seems to have been replicated everywhere, i'm not too worried about it.

as i've already pointed out, the logic of "anti-imperialism" is a leninist /
liberal / social democratic logic, which has continually undermined class
struggle thruout history. you don't need me to point this out... it is in
every history of every "anti-imperialist" movement (all of which ended up
replicating leninist / social democratic models).

history speaks for itself, and my personal experiences merely validate that
history.

"your sad devotion to that ancient religion..." (hee hee)



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---