aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
AUT: Reply by Mauro, Jr to Commie 00
I went thru my VI Lenin CW , PP Moscow, English Edition 3rd print ,1977
-vol 24, pg 294 and I found the quote,
Andrew's words quoted are close to Lenin but Andrew has kind of torn
these out of historical and
political context. Its from April 1918. If you go thru the section Lenin
is actually COMPARING the tasks of what revolutionaries would face in
Germany if they had siezed power there first (State-cap like monopolist
economy) vs. Russia (smaller scale capitalism , production units, trading -
with mass petty bourg layers and is making the point that he thinks that
the German's transition to socialism would be much easier because of
economic coordination and centralization achieved by German (state)
capitalism.
Lenin especially is inveighing here against the Russian petty bourg
sectors who 'support' the smashing of the bigger capitalist's power and
expropriating THEM-- but that the petty bourg just want s to then halt the
Rev. process so the petty bourg. can enhance their own capitalist-exploiter
activities.
OK-The thinking seem somewhat economistic and the Germany- Russia analogy
simplistic , but look at the conditions in Europe in April 1918!
But Lenin CW -Vol 27, pg340. The Andrew quote is accurate. Lenin is
comparing the situation to Russia and Germany in Apr, 1918. It is clear he
thinks big things are about to happen in the German workers /soldiers
revolutionary thrusts to take power. But it seems that Lenin is enamoured
with the dictatorial- centralization
of German state caps power because though capitalism and socialism are
inherently antagonistic modes of production to each other -- Lenin here
points to the commonality (pg341) of both systems having---..
national accounting and control. Lenin here does seem to fetishize the
centralizing side of state cap developement as a real definitive " step"
toward socialism .
He also thinks -pg.342 -- that incorporation fo the 'socialist' state into
the dictatorshp of the proletariat
in the Soviets" - will disarm the dangers in state-cap. He attacks the
'Left -communists' inside the Bolshevik Party too for exposing this
danger-- which would soon came to pass a few years later.
And this does point out the lessons/dangers of an alienating Party-state--
bogarting the power away from the
revolutionary forces massed in the soviets/councils-- The usurpatory acts
of the Bolsheviks at this point
vis a vis the Rev. soviets -councils of workers soldiers, etc (mid-1918)
,at the beginnings of Civil War to the knife-- would become part of a real
catastrophe for the workers in Russia and Worldwide as history teaches us.
The ohter quote of Andrew , Lenin's CW , Vol 24, pg 259 , I could not find
there however. Maybe the wrong vol.
or page?
Neil
communist-left
www.ibrp.org
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- AUT: Re: empire & globalization,
Peter Jovanovic Sat 24 Feb 2001, 05:18 GMT
- AUT: Nader and Mumia, Nader and bureaucratic functioning,
Chris Wright Sat 24 Feb 2001, 04:51 GMT
- AUT: Re: Re: Several,
Chris Wright Sat 24 Feb 2001, 04:35 GMT
- Re: empire & globalization, was... Re: AUT: Re:autonomistcrisis theory,
Chris Wright Sat 24 Feb 2001, 04:20 GMT
- AUT: Reply by Mauro, Jr to Commie 00,
neil Sat 24 Feb 2001, 01:44 GMT
- Re: empire & globalization, was... Re: AUT: Re: autonomistcrisis theory,
battaglia comunista Fri 23 Feb 2001, 18:46 GMT
- AUT: Re: Several,
battaglia comunista Fri 23 Feb 2001, 17:55 GMT
- AUT: RE: An interesting critique of Negri,
Cesar Altamira Fri 23 Feb 2001, 17:18 GMT
- Re: empire & globalization, was... Re: AUT: Re:,
Tahir Wood Fri 23 Feb 2001, 11:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]