Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory

["Chris Wright" <cwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve,

My starting point in a lot of this is the same.  I also find Holloway,
Bonefeld, et al, very suggestive.  If anyone is interested, I have just run
across some excellent material by Paresh Chattopadhyay.  His book on capital
and the Soviet Union seems very interesting and his piece on the Critique of
the Gotha Program and its critique of Lenin is outstanding.  sadly, I only
have it in hard copy.  He starts from the point of view that Marx's notion
of two stages of communism assumes the abolition of the state!  Very close,
detailed reading and an excellent approach.  If there isinterest, i will try
to reproduce sections of his piece on this list, as I think it would be VERY
valuable.

Cheers,
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: <pmargin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory


>
>
> Rob Schaap wrote:
>
> >
> >  Just coz ya can't see stuff don't mean
> > stuff's not happening, eh?
>
> Hi Rob. You've stated very succinctly a question that a few of us in
Melbourne
> have long puzzled over (although I'm no nearer to resolving it than
before). I
> do think there may be some pointers in Curtis Price's recent article on
'Fragile
> Prosperity', though.
>
> On a related note raised by Peter, that of class struggle and crisis
theory: I
> have found John Holloway's work of the late 80s/early 90s concerning the
place
> of the 'insubordination of labour' within capital to be suggestive,
although
> again just a starting point.
>
> Steve (who never seems to have time to join in list discussions anymore).
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---