aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory
Rob Schaap wrote:
>
> Just coz ya can't see stuff don't mean
> stuff's not happening, eh?
Hi Rob. You've stated very succinctly a question that a few of us in Melbourne
have long puzzled over (although I'm no nearer to resolving it than before). I
do think there may be some pointers in Curtis Price's recent article on 'Fragile
Prosperity', though.
On a related note raised by Peter, that of class struggle and crisis theory: I
have found John Holloway's work of the late 80s/early 90s concerning the place
of the 'insubordination of labour' within capital to be suggestive, although
again just a starting point.
Steve (who never seems to have time to join in list discussions anymore).
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Chris Wright Mon 19 Feb 2001, 20:49 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Peter van Heusden Tue 20 Feb 2001, 08:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
bronterre Tue 20 Feb 2001, 16:56 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Sean Fenley Wed 21 Feb 2001, 00:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
pmargin Wed 21 Feb 2001, 02:39 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Chris Wright Wed 21 Feb 2001, 03:28 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Karl Carlile Wed 21 Feb 2001, 07:43 GMT
- RE: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Paul Bowman Wed 21 Feb 2001, 16:14 GMT
- FW: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Paul Bowman Wed 21 Feb 2001, 16:16 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]