aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory
- Subject: Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory
- From: "Chris Wright" <cwright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:49:32 -0600
Hey, thanks! Just wanted to say that I did mean that capital is a text or
textual insome post-modern sense. I meant specifically "Das Kapital" by
Marx. Sorry, I did not make that clear!
Cheers,
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Schaap" <rws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory
> Happy with heaps of your stuff, Chris, but I'm not sure what this bit
means.
>
> >We do need to understand class in a
> >refreshed way, which understands Capital not as an objectivist,
> >structuralist piece of political economy, but as a text where every
category
> >is imbued with class struggle, is constituted by class struggle, is a
> >critique of political economy aimed right at the heart of capital.
>
> Sure, capitalism is a text in the sense that it has authors (human
> society), but what's the nature of the distinction you make above? I
would
> agree that Das Kapital was but one book in a projected corpus (marx was
not
> a well man, and one who took too long getting his manuscripts right - used
> to drive poor Freddie Engels to the odd glass beyond thirst at times), and
> that, being about capital, this particular volume took capital as its
> subject. And, yes, I would agree that people often make the mistake of
> casting the human as non-agentic flotsam in a sea of blind accumulation
> (yes, I loathe the ship Althusser and all the mad opaque antihumanist
> postie ideas who have since sailed in her) as a consequence of Das
> Kapital's historical salience. But none of that means we have to risk
> forays into ambiguity and amorphous gallic terminology. Capitalism is a
> product of man, has contradictions immanent within it, and always and
> everywhere manifests as class struggle. I think we agree, but I'm scared
> we're going where we needn't go here, that's all.
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Sean Fenley Sun 18 Feb 2001, 21:11 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Chris Wright Mon 19 Feb 2001, 14:32 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Rob Schaap Mon 19 Feb 2001, 15:06 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Rob Schaap Mon 19 Feb 2001, 15:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Chris Wright Mon 19 Feb 2001, 20:49 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Peter van Heusden Tue 20 Feb 2001, 08:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
bronterre Tue 20 Feb 2001, 16:56 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
Sean Fenley Wed 21 Feb 2001, 00:26 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: autonomist crisis theory,
pmargin Wed 21 Feb 2001, 02:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]