aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
AUT: RE: Neo-conservatism and workers
- Subject: AUT: RE: Neo-conservatism and workers
- From: "Per-Anders Svärd" <per-anders.svard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:34:58 +0200
Bill wrote:
>I must say to those that do, that I think that the idea of workers
>selfishly appropriating the product of the socially-owned means of
>production seems but a minor variation on capitalism.
I most definitely agree with Bill and Paul. The way I see it this could be regarded as a form of "collectivized capitalism" (to use the vocabulary of Murray Bookchin). It worries me that quite a few syndicalists seem to have this vision of "workers control" and exclusive "ownership" over their labour-product. It seems to go entirely against the basic communist principle of "to each according to his/her need".
/PeA
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- AUT: The Final Approach to Final Status - MERIP PIN by Roger Normand,
Lucy Mair Mon 10 Jul 2000, 20:40 GMT
- AUT: Communist Programme,
George Pennefather Mon 10 Jul 2000, 18:06 GMT
- AUT: troploin/La Banquise,
Antagonism Mon 10 Jul 2000, 15:50 GMT
- AUT: Middle East settlement,
George Pennefather Sat 08 Jul 2000, 13:23 GMT
- AUT: RE: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Per-Anders Svärd Fri 07 Jul 2000, 13:34 GMT
- AUT: Iran and reform,
George Pennefather Fri 07 Jul 2000, 08:33 GMT
- AUT: Article on Wash. protests,
George Pennefather Thu 06 Jul 2000, 21:11 GMT
- AUT: Zimbabwe,
George Pennefather Thu 06 Jul 2000, 14:52 GMT
- AUT: RE: Democratic centralism,
Per-Anders Svärd Thu 06 Jul 2000, 12:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]