aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers
- Subject: Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers
- From: "George Pennefather" <poseidon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:08:27 +0100
Sean: i'm more interested in mass mobilizations of people interested in
radical change. I don't think a Leninist revolution is the worst thing that
could happen, necessarily, but we have witnessed many negative examples.
George: Mass mobilisations of people interested in radical change is a vague
and unprogrammatic formulation. Mass mobilisations, to be revolutionary,
must advance slogans and demands. It is not enought to be merely
interested --a rather passive state. Right wing people may mass mobilise
because they are interested in radical change --interested in opposing it.
Comradely regards
George
Be free to check out our Communist Think-Tank web site at
http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/
Subscribe to Revcommy Mailing Community at
rev-commies-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
George Pennefather Tue 04 Jul 2000, 19:09 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Ilan Shalif Tue 04 Jul 2000, 21:55 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Sean Fenley Wed 05 Jul 2000, 04:16 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
TAHIR WOOD Wed 05 Jul 2000, 06:28 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
George Pennefather Wed 05 Jul 2000, 07:08 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Ilan Shalif Wed 05 Jul 2000, 08:59 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
batcom Wed 05 Jul 2000, 23:29 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Bill Bartlett Thu 06 Jul 2000, 01:16 GMT
- Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers,
Ilan Shalif Thu 06 Jul 2000, 07:58 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]