aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts
- Subject: Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts
- From: Gerald Levy <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:19:19 -0500 (EST)
guy debord wrote:
> hardly. the disagreement is very grounded in concrete
> problems. as someone who falls on the anarchist
> communist side of this debate: i am against unions
> (and syndicalism) because they exist to aclimate us
> into the capitalist system, etc. this is the nature of
> what a union is in this society (if it is going to be
> effective as a union), whether or not it's "directly
> controlled by the rank-and-file".
Hardly.
*Unions exist because working-people fought for them*.
Jerry
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Re: Marxism not worth defending, (continued)
- AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
Jamal Hannah Tue 21 Dec 1999, 09:24 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
guy debord Tue 21 Dec 1999, 19:07 GMT
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
Gerald Levy Tue 21 Dec 1999, 22:19 GMT
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
leila tlon Wed 22 Dec 1999, 04:33 GMT
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
guy debord Wed 29 Dec 1999, 21:46 GMT
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
Jamal Hannah Wed 29 Dec 1999, 22:05 GMT
- SV: AUT: Anarchism & Conflicts,
Per-Anders Svärd Wed 29 Dec 1999, 22:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]