AUT: Re: the anarchism dispute

[Harald Beyer-Arnesen <haraldba@xxxxxxxxx>]

I must I admit that I find this debate rather absurd as far
as what is under discussion is everything from (for instance)
Errico Malatesta to Sex Pistols. I know that this is precisely
"Leutha Blisset"'s point with his being "caught in the halls of
mirrors" picture, though he might as well have referred the Sex
Pistols to the halls of mirrors of "pro-situs".

Despite this, it does not take much of a genius to see that
(for instance) Malatesta and the Sex Pistols is not the same
phenomenom. You might as well ask the marxist on this list
to answer for everything from the "bordigaist-primitivist"
Jacques Cammate to Stalin, and to whether or not these are/
were "authentic" marxists. Both marxists and "pro-situs" -
"unauthentic" by definition - as well as anarchists should of
course answer for the late Fredy Perlman has ever said. And
does really the U.S. magazine "Anarchy" as well as "Hakim Bey"
have their roots in marxism, in as far as they are inspired
by "pro-situ" currents and knowing the Situationist Inter-
national debt to Marx? Both Toni Negri and the Norwegian deep-
ecologist Arne Naess seem to love reading Spinoza, so can we
so to speak discern a deeper relation here?

Harald



  in solidarity,
  Harald Beyer-Arnesen
  haraldba@xxxxxxxxx



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---