aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: strategy/ies
- Subject: Re: AUT: strategy/ies
- From: Gerald Levy <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 10:08:38 -0500 (EST)
> > "The" working
> >class is heterogeneous, divided, hierarchical, often in conflict within
> >itself.
Did you ever notice that the ones who don't appreciate this point and
instead clamour over and over for "unity" (as if it were some sort of
magical formula) are often the biggest opponents in practice to unity?
Also: did you notice that the same people for whom "unity" is all
important often abstain from or SELL-OUT other struggles by the WORKING
CLASS because what is needed is ... "unity"?
How does none build unity *in practice* by indifference to the struggles
of the working class? If that's what "unity" is, then I say screw it! With
that kind of "unity" there will never be a revolution.
Jerry
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Anarchism & th Situationists,
Fabian Tompsett Tue 14 Dec 1999, 11:38 GMT
- AUT: Fw: Speaking of Cyber-Marx...,
rc-am Tue 14 Dec 1999, 03:35 GMT
- AUT: strategy/ies,
Harry M. Cleaver Mon 13 Dec 1999, 23:57 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Bill Bartlett Tue 14 Dec 1999, 13:27 GMT
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Gerald Levy Tue 14 Dec 1999, 15:08 GMT
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Harry M. Cleaver Tue 14 Dec 1999, 15:10 GMT
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Alain Kessi Wed 15 Dec 1999, 02:51 GMT
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Bill Bartlett Wed 15 Dec 1999, 05:40 GMT
- Re: AUT: strategy/ies,
Bill Bartlett Wed 15 Dec 1999, 12:24 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]