Re: AUT: Anarchism & Marxism

[Jamal Hannah <jah@xxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, ROWAN WILSON wrote:

> In terms of theory, Negri would also have a huge problem with the
> humanism that is so prevalent in anarchist theory, i.e., the idea
> that the human subject has a homogeneous essence that is the
> subject of history, the cause which generates history as an effect.
> Theoretically, this is inconsistent as history would then not move.
> Also, this humanist subject is a leninism of its own - if you don't
> share this essence then you are excluded from the party/anarchist
> organisation.

This is bullshit.  Calling anarchism "Leninism" is just smear tactics. I
can play that too.  Autonomism is closer to Leninism than anarchism with
it's obcession with theory and analysis.




     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---