aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: anarchism and marxism
- Subject: Re: AUT: anarchism and marxism
- From: Sergio Fiedler <s.fiedler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 21:22:59 +1000
I agree with Anton. But as a part of an organisation that in sui generis manner
call itself autonomist and anarchist, I tend to think that anarchism was the
result of certain composition of the working class -semi-autonomous workers-
not simply an ideology, but an expression working class subjectivity at certain
time and place.Anarchosydicalism was also the expression of a more industrial
composition of the class disbanded by fordism later on.
If we agree with Negri that working class sujectivity becomes more autonomous
through the collective worker and the general intellect, maybe anarchism has
found a relevant class composition once again to manifest itself politically
without being trascendental.
When I read Anton's definition of autonomism it actually sounds more anarchist
than anarchism itself. I like that.But my isseu is why Negri has never
discussed or written anything on anarchism?
love and rage
Sergio
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]