Re: AUT: IWW on Wharfies (EN)

[Chris <red@xxxxxxx>]

this reply is no different from most e-mail leftists... those who use the
internet to circulate and not exhaust all that can be said are much futher
ahead than this in seeing the reality for all the discourse... we need
more intelligent conversations if we want to communicate constructively

sure, the IWW could have said "Point One: 'Fuck You Bosses'/'All Power To
The Autonomous Workers' " but would this be so much more effective than
beginning with "Fellow Workers in Australia want us to stop the transport
of scab cargo and we are with them"? If the IWW is not revolutionary for
you, maybe you need to converse with others about what revolution means

I'll see you on the picket line,
Chris

On Mon, 18 May 1998, Antagonism wrote:

> This isn't any more than any other unions are asking for, and isn't any more than
> the tactics used in the case of the Liverpool dockers defeat. Australian workers
> are already more advance than this, in that workers from other industries have gone
> on strike in support of the dock-workers. We need different tactics if we want a
> different result to Liverpool. Struggle across sectional/union boundaries, outside
> and against the unions.
>
> Here's the URL of a leaflet from a year ago on the Liverpool docks strike
> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill//Lobby/3909/bridges.html
>
> --
>
> web:  http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill//Lobby/3909/
> email:  mrnobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> post:  BM Makhno, London WC1N 3XX, UK
>
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>



     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---