aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
AUT: Wharfies - and Answers to Questions [or whatever people are
- Subject: AUT: Wharfies - and Answers to Questions [or whatever people are
- From: "dave graham" <davgraham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 03:53:34 PDT
Dear All
Because of my incompetence with this technology and perhaps because I am
getting old, I have somehow managed to delete every single message on
this thread from my 'In box', 'saved messages etc etc so I am writing
this from memory.
Firstly a plea - don't turn my questions into an academic or ideological
debate.
My purpose in asking the questions was not simply one of seeking
information, although that in itself is something that needs doing. Too
many of the replies that I received were simply an excuse to serve up
'old wine in new bottles', and to fight ideological battles that come
from the days of the Second International.
So the first thing is - we need to know in far more detail what is
actually happening on the ground. Some of this information can be got
from the press [even the Left press but in my experience this is the
least informed].
Some can only be got by actually going out and asking people. Here in
Liverpool during the dispute [ and still ] it is relatively easy for us
to go and ask the dockers what is happening, to find out their general
thinking, even the disagreements they are having amongst one another.
Because by and large we have earned their trust and we have not broken
any confidences they are quite willing to do this. One of the things
that we learned very quiclky was the variety of political expressions
and sophistication amongst dockers - this is perhaps the most
politically informed section of workers in the world. So no bollocks
about 'trade union consciousness' please.
I had hoped that those on these lists who particularly share my thinking
might have been able to do the same and ask people directly. I would
surmise that this has not been the case. Presumably those making the
decisions which count are not making themselves available for comment or
even justifying their actions. Hence the lack of reply from the union.
And perhaps the militants feel bound to the MUA and so are not 'open' or
amenable to voicing their real thoughts and feelings.
This I half expected.
However from the lack of news from the pickets, and other scenes of mass
activity, I would gues that the 'social space' that real, autonomous
movements of workers need to organise such things, also hardly exists.
If it did people would find it far easier to raise the issues that need
raising - we would have as a mate of mine here calls it, 'collectivity'.
This would generate a lot of energy and debate, but I see little
evidence so far of this.
This is itself is very telling. It rather puts in perspective all the
talk of some on these lists of 'mass, wildcat pickets' and so on. And it
certainly knocks the idea of party building completely on the head. If
the working class needs a party [and who knows in the future it might] -
it would build one. Here not many dockers came away from a day on the
picket line saying 'what we need is a new party' - on an average picket
line there were generally representatives of at least half a dozen they
could choose from. Significantly also, over the whole 28 months of the
dispute the only recruit I know of is Jimmy Nolan who joined Arthur
Scargill's SLP - well done Arthur.
Secondly there have recently been some people who have begun to develop
some of the questions that I had posed [an example here is Earl Gilman
who brings up the experiences he knows of amongst Hispanic workers -
thanks for raising this experience Earl]. This it seems to me is where
much useful work [and it is work] can be done. This was my main purpose
in posing the questions
The questions I asked demand practical answers - answers in the here and
now. Irrespective of whether the MUA 'wins' the present dispute [and
what 'winning' means in the present context is debatable] the Patrick's
workforce has lost its jobs. What is to happen to them ?
Will the banks put together a 'rescue package' [and saddle the workforce
/MUA/ community] with a load of debt? Or will the workers themselves see
that we are no longer dealing with a simple jobs issue but one involving
the entire question of the reproduction of the working class in modern
capitalist society. I found it very interesting that banks are being
picketed and their role being questioned - more information please.
How are these workers managing - what structures and organisation is
emerging to look after the homes, feeding, kids, education, leisure and
so on of Patrick's workers ? Or because they are alleged to be a
'priveleged' labour aristocracy' [NOT] are they simply being left to the
capitalist market or the Oz social [in]security system to solve ?
I could go on and on, but I am not on the spot and without such hard
information [information which I tried to provide in my reports during
the dispute here] it is very hard to understand and relate to what is
going on.
If the answers to the kinds of questions I am asking can be forthcoming,
workers all over the world will be able to relate much more concretely
to what is happening and the muzzle, that official organisation is able
to put over our struggle, will be much more effectively broken.
As ever, my grateful thanks to those who are, as we say here 'on my
wavelength'.
And if anyone in Oz can actually get answers to my questions . . . .
Take care
DG
'Those who work hard and do their best - go down the road with all the
rest.'
my mate Jimmy Burns
PS I don't even have copies of my original posts.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: This list is getting a bit weird, (continued)
- AUT: netizens in danger/free speech,
Luther Blissettt Sat 02 May 1998, 11:58 GMT
- AUT: netizens/free speech,
Luther Blissettt Sat 02 May 1998, 11:56 GMT
- AUT: Italian netizens are in danger,
Luther Blissettt Sat 02 May 1998, 11:54 GMT
- AUT: Wharfies - and Answers to Questions [or whatever people are,
dave graham Sat 02 May 1998, 10:53 GMT
- AUT: Fw: *AC* Global Women: URGENT ACTION ALERT ON IRAN,
robert brown Sat 02 May 1998, 07:42 GMT
- Re: AUT:Louis on Reeves,
Katha Pollitt Sat 02 May 1998, 02:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]