AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again

Subject: AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again
From: Katha Pollitt <kpollitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:55:18 -0500

P>S> If Selma james was such a feminist, why did she take her husband's
name when she married?


     --- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Prev by Date: Re: AUT: [Fwd: We Were A Funny Comando]
Next by Date: Re: AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again
Previous by thread: AUT: [Fwd: We Were A Funny Comando]
Next by thread: Re: AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- AUT: (en) more Chumbawamba (fwd), pmargin Fri 13 Feb 1998, 02:37 GMT
- AUT: Re: Selma James Name Change, Katha Pollitt Thu 12 Feb 1998, 23:01 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: AUT: Re: Selma James Name Change, Forrest T Hylton Mon 16 Feb 1998, 18:32 GMT
  - Re: AUT: Re: Selma James Name Change, johngray Mon 16 Feb 1998, 19:43 GMT
- AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again, Katha Pollitt Thu 12 Feb 1998, 19:55 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: AUT: Re: Wages for Housework, again, Forrest T Hylton Thu 12 Feb 1998, 20:40 GMT
- AUT: [Fwd: We Were A Funny Comando], Matt Davies Thu 12 Feb 1998, 18:55 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: AUT: [Fwd: We Were A Funny Comando], Katha Pollitt Thu 12 Feb 1998, 19:18 GMT
  - Re: AUT: [Fwd: We Were A Funny Comando], Montyneill Sat 14 Feb 1998, 23:34 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]