aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?
- Subject: Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?
- From: Shaksway@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 12:11:49 EST
In a message dated 98-02-08 01:26:19 EST, you write:
<< Actually, this was Paul's idea, but it's a good illustration of what
I tried, without success, to persuade you all of: that wages for
housework, like the family wage, at least at this stage of history,
reinforces reactionary and unequal gender roles . If it liberated women
to stay home and take care of children, the Christian Coalition would
not be in favor of subsidizing it.
>>
Actually, it would only give state monies to women who would have stayed at
home anyway. It is a backdoor attempt to give Xian families state funds so
they can further opt out of the public school systems.
jim davis
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: abstract labour, (continued)
- AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Katha Pollitt Sun 08 Feb 1998, 06:14 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Harald Beyer-Arnesen Sun 08 Feb 1998, 16:34 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Shaksway Sun 08 Feb 1998, 17:11 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Paul Mattick Sun 08 Feb 1998, 23:39 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Montyneill Mon 09 Feb 1998, 02:17 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Montyneill Mon 09 Feb 1998, 02:17 GMT
- Re: AUT: Re: Republican Wages for Housework?,
Paul Mattick Mon 09 Feb 1998, 03:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]