aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes
- Subject: Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes
- From: Gerald Levy <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 14:15:04 -0500 (EST)
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Gerald Levy wrote:
> >2) To ask "what does this fine distinction do for you politically" is to
> >ask the wrong question. The "ultimate aim" of _Capital_ was to "reveal the
> >economic law of motion of modern society". It was not intended as a "How
> >to" book re strategy and tactics for revolutionaries.
> Surely the guy who wrote that famous thesis about changing the world, and
> not merely understanding it, might have a slightly different take on this
> question.
The same "guy" who wrote the "Theses on Fuerbach" wrote (in July, 1867 in
the "Preface to the First Edition" to _Capital_, Volume 1):
"... it is the ultimate aim of this work to reveal the economic law of
modern society" (Penguin ed., p. 92).
Thus, I would suggest that I have the same "take" on this question as that
"guy".
Jerry
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Ilan Shalif Thu 05 Feb 1998, 11:38 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Doug Henwood Thu 05 Feb 1998, 16:36 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Thu 05 Feb 1998, 18:30 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Doug Henwood Thu 05 Feb 1998, 18:46 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Thu 05 Feb 1998, 19:15 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Fri 06 Feb 1998, 00:28 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Montyneill Fri 06 Feb 1998, 02:11 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Montyneill Fri 06 Feb 1998, 02:11 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Paul Mattick Fri 06 Feb 1998, 02:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]