aut-op-sy
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes
- Subject: Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes
- From: Gerald Levy <glevy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 13:30:08 -0500 (EST)
Doug Henwood wrote to Paul M:
> And what does this fine distinction do for you politically, aside from
> providing an elegant excuse for the value theorist to ignore household
> relations?
1) Who is ignoring household relations? I certainly don't read Paul M as
suggesting that. And it was most certainly not "an elegant excuse" by
Paul.
2) To ask "what does this fine distinction do for you politically" is to
ask the wrong question. The "ultimate aim" of _Capital_ was to "reveal the
economic law of motion of modern society". It was not intended as a "How
to" book re strategy and tactics for revolutionaries.
Jerry
--- from list aut-op-sy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes, (continued)
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Montyneill Thu 05 Feb 1998, 02:51 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Paul Mattick Thu 05 Feb 1998, 05:29 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Ilan Shalif Thu 05 Feb 1998, 11:38 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Doug Henwood Thu 05 Feb 1998, 16:36 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Thu 05 Feb 1998, 18:30 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Doug Henwood Thu 05 Feb 1998, 18:46 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Thu 05 Feb 1998, 19:15 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Gerald Levy Fri 06 Feb 1998, 00:28 GMT
- Re: AUT: Remarks on Midnight Notes,
Montyneill Fri 06 Feb 1998, 02:11 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]