A-list
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [A-List] Clinical Death For Organization Of American States



Bells are not tolling as much for OAS as for something still deeper:
the answer by Jobim reveals that _de facto_ the Junta Sudamericana de
Defensa (Joint South American Defense Board), still not born, has
begun to exist.  This is the first attempt at a common army in Latin
America since the times of San MartÃn and BolÃvar. The fearful
dreadnought is surging from the depths where both Britain and US
thought it lay sunken forever.

2008/4/27, Tony B. <tal1@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Rozoff" <r_rozoff@xxxxxxxxx>
>  To: "Rick Rozoff" <r_rozoff@xxxxxxxxx>
>  Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2008 5:51 PM
>  Subject: Clinical Death For Organization Of American States
>
>
>
> > http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2008/abril/vier25/OAS.html
> >
> >
> > Granma International
> > April 25, 2008
> >
> >
> > Clinical death for OAS
> > BY NIDIA DIAZ
> >
> >
> > History is full of events that later prove to be
> > defining in the lives of peoples.
> >
> > The call made by Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa
> > for the foundation of "an organization of Latin
> > American states that does not lend itself to tutelage.
> > and which includes countries of the region that have
> > been absurdly excluded from international forums," has
> > put on the table what everyone has recognized: the
> > clinical death of the Organization of American States
> > (OAS) and its inevitable end.
> >
> > The call, supported this time by Mexican President
> > Felipe Calderon, was made months ago by Venezuelan
> > leader Hugo Chavez Frias, and was received favorably
> > by the Brazilian head of state, Luiz Inacio Lula da
> > Silva, confirming the strategic vision of the Cuban
> > revolutionary leadership which in the early 1960's
> > described the Organization of American States (OAS),
> > as the Ministry of Yankee Colonies, which has nothing
> > to do with Latin American interests or aspirations.
> >
> > Examples abound as to the organization's submissive
> > and compromising behavior over the last 50 years,
> > during which Washington, owner and master of the
> > group, dictated the standards, demanded sanctions and
> > banished those who opposed U.S. domination.
> >
> > The OAS, for those who don't remember, gave its
> > blessing to invasions and violations of Latin American
> > and Caribbean sovereignty, and held in high regard the
> > main perpetrators of these actions under the guise of
> > the hypocritical defense of a unilaterally imposed
> > political model which sought to extend for all time
> > the colonial and neocolonial past suffered by Latin
> > Americans, which left the great majority excluded and
> > marginalized.
> >
> > Up until recently, the uncompromising voice of Cuba
> > was the only one heard accusing the group of
> > disloyalty and ineffectiveness and warning of the
> > dangerous control that U.S. imperialism exercised from
> > its seat.
> >
> > The small island was not always heard and more than a
> > few attributed its charges to its differences with the
> > powerful northern neighbor.
> >
> > The continent paid dearly for decades of
> > neoliberalism, military dictatorships, governments
> > that had "carnal" relations with the master - which
> > occurred not only in Argentina - until the political,
> > economic and social situation deteriorated to the
> > point that the masses stepped forward to ensure the
> > reemergence of a new wave of revolutionary,
> > nationalist and anti-imperialist movements.
> >
> > Using the chipped and rusty weapons of representative
> > democracy, they tore the traditional parties to shreds
> > and have elected new political leaders who have
> > assumed their mandates committed to the conquest of
> > sovereignty and self-determination.
> >
> > These representatives of the people have been
> > responsible for Washington's loss of control, little
> > by little, of lives and land in this part of the world
> > and have additionally contributed to the decline of
> > U.S. influence within the OAS, despite its policy of
> > blackmail.
> >
> > Still fresh is the defeat suffered by the U.S.
> > government in June of 2007, when the new iron lady,
> > Condoleezza Rice, with no convincing arguments, was
> > forced to leave the 37th General Assembly of the OAS
> > without managing a happy ending to the show prepared
> > by the White House to attack the Bolivarian Revolution
> > when, using its constitutional prerogatives, the
> > Venezuelan government did not renew the operating
> > license of coup-supporting Radio Caracas Television
> > (RCTV).
> >
> > The previous year, during the OAS' 36th session, the
> > government of Peruvian President Alejandro Toledo had
> > taken on Washington's work, unsuccessfully promoting a
> > condemnation of the Bolivarian Revolution and
> > attempting to impose on the hemisphere's agenda the
> > issue of Venezuela's supposed interference in
> > expressing public support for the candidacy of the
> > nationalist Ollanta Humala.
> >
> > Without any doubt, these events contributed to the
> > development of the current situation in which the
> > ineffectiveness of the group is clear. It is an
> > inadequate organization, incapable of facing the
> > realities of the times, during which, as President
> > Rafael Correa has said, "Ecuador has stopped being,
> > forever, the backyard and branch office of a world
> > power." The same could be said for Venezuela, Bolivia,
> > Nicaragua, Brazil and others.
> >
> > It was, therefore, clearer than ever before, when the
> > Colombian army violated the territorial integrity of
> > Ecuador with the complicity and support of U.S.
> > intelligence services, that the new Latin America and
> > Caribbean needs a new regional organization that will
> > remove them, once and for all, from the impositions,
> > control and interests of U.S. imperialism.
> >
> > The solitary vote of the U.S. within the OAS in
> > support of the Colombian attack on Ecuador was the
> > moribund organization's definitive fall into an
> > irreversible coma and it opened the eyes of the few
> > who still considered mere rhetoric the Bush doctrine
> > of "preemptive war" and the willingness of the U.S. to
> > attack any "dark corner of the world", especially
> > those where people have begun to say, "No, Mister."
> >
> > At such a transcendentally important moment and given
> > the weakness shown by the OAS in the face of such
> > interference and genocide, the Rio Group, meeting in a
> > presidential summit in Santo Domingo, did not hesitate
> > to express its solidarity with Ecuador and defend,
> > with a united voice, the principles of
> > self-determination and non-intervention, which are
> > fundamental.
> >
> > It is no accident that in Santo Domingo, Nicaraguan
> > President Daniel Ortega advocated the creation of a
> > new Organization of Latin American States, as his
> > Ecuadorian counterpart had done days before, the
> > embryonic form of which already exists within the Rio
> > Group, a coordinating group forged in the 1980's to
> > oppose the interventionist policy of the Reagan
> > administration.
> >
> > According to Brazil, the proposed organization should
> > not be limited to political issues, that equally
> > necessary is the creation of a regional defense
> > council, the objectives of which would be far removed
> > from those of the Inter-American Defense Board, with
> > its headquarters in Washington and through which
> > different U.S. administrations have exercised, as
> > another journalist has said, "harmful interference in
> > Latin American armed forces, attempting to convert the
> > aforementioned Board into a coup d'Ãtat, genocide and
> > torture training ground for those in its service."
> >
> > It is worth remembering that last March 21 a meeting
> > took place between the Brazilian and U.S. defense
> > departments during which the Brazilian minister made a
> > comment to his U.S. counterpart, Robert Gates, on the
> > South American defense initiative. Gates asked, "What
> > can we do?" Nelson Jobim answered, "Stay out of the
> > way."
> >
> > A memorable response that aptly portrays the new
> > times.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Be a better friend, newshound, and
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 

NÃstor Gorojovsky
El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autorÃa


Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]