A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] Raúl on the 26th + Fidel Cuba's Self Criticism/US communist notes
"Physical labor on its own does not generate conscience."
Comment
Or consciousness, or a sense of the world in which we live, or an
understanding of the impact of classes, property, and the history of ideas or the
meaning of culture as the history of a generalized lived experience. The modern
history of class as military conflict and life style combines with and
interacts upon the formation and evolution of what we call the consumer society.
Comrade Raul estimate and criticism of the efficiency of reproduction and
distribution of meat stuff and milk in Cuban society, from point of origin - the
milking of a cow, to consumption by children and adults raises a complex of
questions revolutionaries in the imperial centers have grappled with for many
years. Cuba poses every theoretical question in the treasure house of Marx
as practical questions of the proletarian revolution. For instance, is not the
question of meat and milk production also a question of the historic breach
between town and country, which evolved in modern âEuropeanâ driven history
as the struggle between town - the bourgeoisie, and country - the feudalist?
Interestingly, in the imperial centers and most certainly America, we face
these same issues from a different location in the social equation. Because
American society is dying from over consumption of food stuff and everything
else, and is locked into an intractable spontaneous battle against consumption
and obesity, we are compelled, in our to live from day to day in reasonable
health, to ask a different set of questions springing from the same social
equation. We cannot avoid these questions.
Why do human beings drink cow milk? What is the history of this culture?
Generally speaking, statistic state that milk consumption in America has been
steadily falling for 40 years. What is the history of a heavy meat diet?
Although meat is not the worst thing one can eat, the meat and milk culture, as it
exists in todayâs world as a reproduction relation, is the recreation of
culture specific to the bourgeoisie. For an American communist to state such is
to risk being called arrogant, insensitive and out right chauvinistic towards
the plight of the former colonials and the battling proletarian masses in
Cuba and throughout the world.
This is not the case.
As a child I slowly discovered through great bodily pain and agony that I
could not digest milk, ice cream and an assortment of dairy products. I did not
stop drinking milk until in my teens, but the quiet conversation amongst my
peer group was always, âblack people cannot digest milk.â Under what
conditions is our species driven to consume the milk of another animal and is it not
a law of earth-nature, that off springs of mammals seize milk consumption,
after the off spring has left the breast of mother?
Cuba was a slave society, which is to say a historical unraveling of its
milk and meat culture would produce some starling and interesting observations.
Cuba is blessed with a location that could make it a primary area of non
chemicalized fruit and vegetable production, as well as a garden of various
herbal products.
Milk consumption apart from and outside of motherâs milk, is harmful to the
human organism because when it combines in the body with other harmful
substances, obstructions are formed to the efficient operations of the human body.
Here, a concept of efficiency and vitality as a law system is being deployed.
Patience is asked, because in America we are dying of over consumption of
food stuff and the solution is not âless consumptionâ but to halt consumption
of a complex of things and dismantle the infrastructure designed to reproduce
those things we should not be consuming in the first place. âLess consumptionâ
is the transition program.
Efficiency is at all times the steady and conscious removal of obstruction
in a metabolic process. Efficiency as applied to production relations is the
removal of obstruction and the shortening of designs in the process of
reproduction and distribution. Efficiency is not a bourgeois concept of process
logic although efficiency as bourgeois production relations is viewed from the
standpoint of value production. Value production is understood to mean
production with profit as its purpose. Efficiency is measured in many ways, even when
we cannot ascertain the long term outcome of our impact on the earth,
society and the individual. Efficiency is labor replacing devices with a potential
to free larger segments of labor from the societal battle for subsistence.
Efficiency is the accumulation of productive forces, as measured against a
preexisting combination of tools, machines, energy source + human labor used in
the process of reproduction and distribution.
It is useless and wrong to adopt an anti-technological development attitude.
How technology is evolved and configured; and for what purposes it is
deployed and where it is deployed is of concern. âCommunist humanâ seems to me a
concept needed to replace the old concept of âsocialist man.â âSocialist manâ
is said to be distinguished by his consciousness and selflessness in the
process of labor.
The bourgeois critics decried that âsocialist manâ was a lifeless
instrument of the state without individuality or the creative spirit, while reserving
creativity and spirit to those with money.
Above all âsocialist manâ was of course âman,â in as much as men occupied
the industrial and military fronts, but more than that, this man was
industrial and imbued with the logic of the industrial epoch. Consequently, this
socialist man love of the earth was a love - ethics and morality, shaped by the
industrial epoch and the medieval metaphysics of properties from which the
industrial epoch evolved. This history of process logic is called into question
.
Communist human is freed from such logic. I am reminded of some words from
Cheâs âSocialism and Man in Cuba.â
âOur task is to prevent the current generation, torn asunder by its
conflicts, from becoming perverted and from perverting new generations. We must not
create either docile servants of official thought, or âscholarship studentsâ
who live at the expense of the state â practicing freedom in quotation marks.
Revolutionaries will come who will sing the song of the new man and woman in
the true voice of the people. This is a process that takes time.â
Our current generation in America, has by design, been deprived of basic
education and a fundamental sense of earth and species being. This generation
has been deprived of a historical sense of process logic and even the mechanical
logic of the industrial epoch. This generation is perverted in a way where
its individual rights and assumptions are running into the most basic laws of
our species metabolic processes. Obesity is the face of the last and final
stage of bourgeois rule. Universal over consumption in the imperial centers and
under consumption outside the imperial centers. This under consumption does
not mean the lack of things but the lack of nutrient. The human body does not
convert milk and meat stuff into nutrient or rather the primary source of
nutrient on earth springs from vegetation and fruits., sunlight and clean air -
nitrates. Communism in America has never tackled this issue of over
consumption as a metabolic process defining the species and the specific behavior of
our own working class, as it becomes spontaneously driven to combat this
destructive culture.
Cuba has within it some of the most beautiful people - human beings, on
earth and their beauty and health stems from their biology and consumption. Cuba
has much the world can learn from and can, if it chooses, market its beauty
while communists in the imperial centers learn how to wage the struggle for
beauty. Modern communism is a struggle for beauty in all its dimensions.
Obesity is degeneracy and the ultimate human ugliness, although our bourgeoisie
has been waging an unrelenting centuryâs long battle to convince humanity that
plump and fat is a sign of health and human vitality.
It is of course easy to accuse this writer of advocating starvation policy
for humanity outside the imperial centers, but this is not the case at all. The
front of the battle against obesity is in the imperial centers. A
dispassionate examination of what constitutes human beauty, even with all its
variations, means a body with the least amount of obstructions to its harmonious
metabolic processes. In America the average person, carries with them for a
lifetime, no less than 10 - 50 pounds of dead matter in their body. The
implications of this cultural fact is startling.
Say, 30 pounds of always present death matter, requires a daily input of âXâ
amount of âfood stuffâ - which is not really the meaning of food,
multiplied by 300,000, 000 people. This daily process requires âXâ amount of direct
water input for the individual and another âXâ amount of energy resources
and configuration of the reproduction infrastructure. A heavy meat and milk diet
is impossible to sustain and will lead to rapid death, without massive
alcohol consumption, which required reconfiguring our productivity infrastructure
and system of reproduction a certain way. Alcohol production, distribution
and consumption is one of the cornerstones of bourgeois imperialism long
history of New World colonization and resulted in horrible destruction and
disfigurement of the earlier peoples of this hemisphere. Any society that follows
this pattern of consumption will produce the same or similar results that exist
in America and be thrown into conflict with the metabolic process governing
our species existence and the earth. In addition a similar generalized form of
awareness - consciousness as understanding of species relations, will be
spun. Here the issue is not simply exchange within the world market but cultural
consciousness as the battle for human beauty. Exchange on it own, when
detached from what is exchanged, why it is produced in the first place and how it
is produced, does not generate conscience.
The practical approach of communists, is to try and disclose the key link or
links in a chain of events and grab hold of the key link, in order to pull
the entire chain forward. In America the practical communist approach has
varied, deviated from the world communist movement, at various junctures of its
evolution
The more efficient production and distribution of meat and milk, - anything,
most certainly entails eliminating obstructions and shortening design in
transportation and distribution, even in America. Energy conservation - a very
bourgeois way to approach energy conversion, is important to everyone.
In as much as we in America suffer from over consumption of everything, the
question of critically examining everything produced and why it is produced is
important. Not just how it is produced - the technological infrastructure,
but why it is produced in the first place.
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
- Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] Profit without End: Capitalism Is Just Getting Started, (continued)
- [A-List] Petrodollar,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 28 Jul 2007, 22:04 GMT
- [A-List] More Ward Churchill... Newsweek Interview,
The Buffalo In Da' Midst Sat 28 Jul 2007, 19:09 GMT
- [A-List] What Did Ward Churchill Actually Say?,
The Buffalo In Da' Midst Sat 28 Jul 2007, 18:46 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Raúl on the 26th + Fidel Cuba's Self Criticism/US communist notes,
Waistline2 Sat 28 Jul 2007, 18:10 GMT
- [A-List] The Apostate: A Zionist politician loses faith in the future (The New Yorker),
Jim Farmelant Sat 28 Jul 2007, 14:19 GMT
- [A-List] Rain Dance,
Bill Totten Sat 28 Jul 2007, 14:08 GMT
- [A-List] Washington's Contradictory "Strategy" toward Saudi Arabia,
Yoshie Furuhashi Sat 28 Jul 2007, 03:28 GMT
- [A-List] Raúl on the 26th + Fidel on Cuba's Self Criticism,
Yoshie Furuhashi Fri 27 Jul 2007, 23:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]