A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] Cassandra
Our end-time prophet attends a Tory-run seminar, where the climate of opinion
still hotly favours trade and power
The Ecologist (March 2007)
'Trade In a Changing Climate' was the title of a seminar I attended in London
last month, run by the Conservative Party. If you want to know why we are in
such a mess and why there is not the remotest prospect of any government doing
anything constructive to alleviate it or its consequences, you should have been
there.
All the platform people seemed to share a common delusion that trade was a good
thing regardless, and climate change was an unfortunate marginal matter of which
we ought to take proper notice where we can, but meanwhile let us get on with
the serious job of developing the economies of the poor countries so that they
can enjoy the same standards of living (they really mean the same standards of
material consumption) as we in the rich countries.
One speaker, a Julian Morris of an International Policy Network, as well as
being a Visiting Professor of some luckless university, produced a stream of
statistics to show that, over the past century or so, millions more people had
been enjoying better health, better education, better life expectancy, lower
infant mortality and so on - all of which, he appeared to urge, was the result
of development and of free markets and that we could look for the same results
from the poor countries if they would only brave the same route.
I listened in a sort of daze of disbelief that anyone professing to profess
anything at all in matters academic could be so divorced from the realities
around him and so blind as to where we were heading.
The rich countries have reached their current unsteady and utterly unsustainable
apex of 'development' by bankrupting our posterity of basic resources such as
oil; by perpetrating crimes against the natural world in terms of species
poisoning and elimination, of soil and oceanic degradation that will beggar
humanity for generations; by promoting the biological hoodlumism of global
warming; and by disintegrating our local community structures, the oldest
social unit in all human history, to such a degree that our prisons and
hospitals are full to overflowing and that figures for such ills as cancer,
venereal infections, juvenile behaviour disorders and psychotic forms of social
dislocation and family breakdown are climbing to ever higher levels as millions
resort increasingly to drugs and opiates to relieve the stresses all this
wonderful development is imposing on them.
There is, of course, not the remotest prospect that the billions of people
living in 'undeveloped' countries will ever experience anything remotely akin
to the affluent consumerist lifestyle of the West.
The resources are just not there and global warming is but one of a scream of
planetary protests at the ways we have already abused our biological eminence to
indulge our boardroom-dominated abandonment of social and ethical responsibility.
The signs are multiplying around us that global warming excesses - in terms of
resource squandering, biological abuse, social disruption and psychic disbalance
have reached the limits that a finite planet can afford. Any attempt to pursue
our current policies of 'development' can only hasten the onward ride of the
horsemen of the apocalypse: of war, resource bankruptcy, an oceanic population
flood, climatic catastrophe and economic breakdown as the global boardroom
bubble goes pop, and the social immiseration of millions trapped in economic
and political structures they have no way at all of controlling.
At heart, the problem confronting us, one which has bedevilled human scholarship
and seeking for centuries, is not one of resources or of economic planning, it
is one of morality.
What is the purpose of economic activity? The accumulated moral wisdom of
humankind makes it clear that empires, especially modern boardroom ones,
are too huge and too immersed in power struggles to even begin to entertain
such questions. They are questions that pertain rather to the sphere where
human relationships take their natural pre-eminence within the jealously
guarded confines of small, localised human communities, ones where restraint
and discipline can prevail on a consensual basis involving no loss of liberty.
The seminar was held in the Royal Society of Arts, which professes, I am glad to
report, 'a tradition of challenging thinking'. I have to say I saw not a glimmer
of this challenge here, not a hint of recognition that the coming decades are
likely to see food riots in major cities of the West even more common than they
are in Africa today, and that if we are serious about meeting the challenge of
global warming with any concern for reality, we should be embarking on a massive
global programme of de-industrialisation. One chairman of a discussion appealed
for practical proposals; I could give him nothing more practical and imperative
that that we should do just about the opposite of almost everything we are doing
now.
_____
In his 85 years, Cassandra has been an orphan, runaway, communist, cook, beggar,
editor, presidential advisor, prisoner and priest. In a former life she was a
Greek prophetess whose unerring prophecies of impending disaster were cursed
to go unheeded.
http://www.billtotten.blogspot.com
http://www.ashisuto.co.jp
- Thread context:
- [A-List] Reversal of Fortune,
Bill Totten Wed 21 Mar 2007, 23:15 GMT
- [A-List] Columbia steps up,
Charles Brown Wed 21 Mar 2007, 19:01 GMT
- [A-List] India's Maoists: Bandh and Strategy,
Yoshie Furuhashi Wed 21 Mar 2007, 16:42 GMT
- [A-List] Cassandra,
Bill Totten Wed 21 Mar 2007, 12:24 GMT
- [A-List] Private equity vs. hedge funds,
Michael Keaney Wed 21 Mar 2007, 09:51 GMT
- [A-List] Europe: snowballing financial mayhem,
Michael Keaney Wed 21 Mar 2007, 09:48 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]