Re: [A-List] Who and What is a "Real Indian"?

[Omahkohkiaayo_ipoyi <omahkohkiaayo@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Michael Hudson <michael.hudson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks, Jim,
It's obvious that when the Bureau of Indian Affairs refers to "the
Indian problem," it means the problem that there are Indians. And this
scares the shit out of Western US politicians.


Response Jim C:

No, thank you Michael, you got it exactly and there are many on the US and
Canadian left who either do not get it or just don't give a fuck. Further,
those intent on wiping out Indians are forced to repudiate and expose the
hypocrisy of their own private property and other "sacreds", along with
Article VI Section 2 of the US Constitution, as they continue in their
illegal "takings" (illegal even in terms of their own laws and legal
constructs) of Indian lands and genocide. In addition to outright and naked
abrogations of existing treaties, another way to get rid of treaties and
their applicability of their terms, is to simply get rid of any ancestors
of those who signed the original treaties: No Indigenous Peoples left, no
applicable treaties or treaty rights left to apply.

thanks,

Jim C/Omahkohkiaayo i'poyi




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Want to start your own business?
Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/r-index