A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] Why Fisk is wrong about Lebanon
Companion piece:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16267.htm
World ignores signs of civil war in Lebanon
By Robert Fisk in Beirut
=======
http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/169/1/
Why Fisk is wrong about Lebanon
Sunday, 28 January 2007
By Mike Whitney
"This is how the conflict began in Lebanon. Outbreaks of sectarian
hatred, appeals for restraint, promises of aid from Western and Arab
nations and a total refusal to understand that this is how civil wars
begin". Robert Fisk, "World ignores Signs of Civil War in Lebanon" UK
Independent 1-27-07
01/28/07 "ICHBlog" -- -- Robert Fisk is all wrong about Lebanon. The
country is not on the brink of another "civil war", but has been
subsumed in an "imperial war" engineered in Tel Aviv and Washington.
He's also mistaken in thinking that the Paris 3 Conference is
designed to "save" Lebanon from the mountain of debt which piled up
after Israel's destructive 34 day war. The real purpose of the $7.6
billion in loans is to shackle Lebanon to the international lending
institutions that are demanding additional taxes on the poor, more
privatization of state-run industries, and restructuring the economy
to meet the requirements of the global banking elite.
According to a recent article by Chris Marsden in countercurrents:
"Only a fraction of the loans will be spent on reconstruction
projects. Most will go towards servicing Lebanon's short-term debt
and therefore back into the coffers of the imperialist governments
and financial institutions, while leaving Lebanon's long-term debts
to climb even higher. The rest will go into paying the Lebanese army
(and security services) in order to suppress the opposition in the
Shia areas in the south of the country. And, once again, any money
given will be made conditional on the government implementing the
reforms demanded by the IMF and World Bank."
This is the real war--the class war-- that continues to be directed
at the people in developing world.
How many times have we seen the World Bank and IMF swoop down on
their prey after a nation has been savaged by war only to apply the
vice-grips of massive debt and set up another corporate colony? The
rise of sectarianism and the "clash of civilizations" bunkum is just
the mask that conceals the real struggle; the ongoing war and
exploitation of the people who have no voice in government.
Here's a question for Fisk: Is there any doubt now that the US and
Israel used the UN to push Syrian troops out of Lebanon just so they
could execute their bloody plan to invade the country and set up a
puppet regime in Beirut? Or was that merely a coincidence?
And, is there any doubt that World Bank president, Paul Wolfowitz,
knew that he would be used in Phase 2 of the assault on Lebanese
sovereignty by providing more economy-busting loans?
The US military is just the left hand of the banking establishment.
One hand washes the other.
It's the perfect system; the US-Israeli war machine flattens an
entire country and then their buddies in the in the corporate-banking
business rake in the profits from loans and reconstruction contracts.
At the same time, they insist that the "New Lebanon" be rebuilt
according to the neoliberal model; the same economic model that has
kept Latin America and Africa in abject poverty for 2 decades.
Fisk is wrong; it's not "sectarian hatred" that is driving the war,
but outside powers that are using their proxies within Lebanon to
achieve their geopolitical objectives. In other words, this not the
beginning of civil war, but a continuation of the 34 Day war; the
deliberate pulverizing of Lebanon to create an US-Israeli
protectorate in a critical area of the Middle East. Future pipeline
corridors and regional hegemony require a compliant pro-western
government in Beirut. That's why the Bush administration has armed
and trained the massive security apparatus of Prime Minister Fouad
Siniora, so he could succeed where Israel failed, by crushing
Hezbollah and the pro-democracy movement.
On the other hand, Hezbollah is demanding that the Siniora respect
the constitution and step down to allow for the formation of a unity
government. That is what is REQUIRED under the law (after six members
of the Parliament walked out, it effectively disbanded the
government) and that is why Hezbollah has been camped out in the
center of the city since December 1.
If the Bush administration was serious about democracy, they'd throw
their support behind the opposition. (Hezbollah and Michel Aoun's
Free Patriotic Movement) But then we know what happens when the will
of the people clashes with the aims of the administration. (check the
war against the democratically-elected government of Hamas)
Siniora's political base is limited to Sunnis, some parts of the
Christian community, and the Lebanese business elite (Hariri). Some
of them like, Samir Geagea, "the ex-civil war militia killer" are
connected to right-wing extremist organizations. These are the groups
who stand to benefit the most from an open confrontation with
Hezbollah. Washington needs them to conceal its dirty war; a war that
Bush stepped up last week when he authorized the CIA "to take covert
action against Hezbollah as part of a secret plan to help the
Lebanese government prevent the spread of Iranian influence. Senators
and congressmen have been briefed on the classified 'non-lethal
presidential finding' that allows the CIA to provide financial and
logistical support for Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora". (UK Telegraph)
Consider this: Siniora is freely violating Lebanese sovereignty to
conduct covert operations against the very people (Hezbollah) who
stood alone in defending Lebanon from Israeli invasion. Additionally,
he is accepting this "assistance" from the United States knowing that
it was the Bush administration that provided the laser-guided
munitions and cluster-bombs which were used to kill Lebanese
nationals just months ago.
And one last thing; despite his promises, Siniora has made no effort
to help the poor Shias in the South rebuilt their homes and
communities. Much like the victims of Katrina, the Shia have been
left to languish in the ruins created by Israel's relentless bombing
raids.
Is it any wonder why Nasrallah and Aoun want to get rid of Siniora?
It should be noted that the Bush administration sees no inconsistency
in a policy that supports Sunnis in Lebanon, but Shias in Iraq. The
rule of thumb appears to be: "If our actions create greater mayhem
and suffering for Muslims, then we are on the right course."
Hezbollah chief, Hassan Nasrallah, has wisely ordered his people to
stop their acts of civil disobedience and to get off the streets to
avoid further violence. Three Shias were reportedly killed by snipers
at the university. Already we can see the familiar tactics which have
been used in cities in Iraq.
Nasrallah, is portrayed in the western press as a provocateur, but he
has kept the peace for the last 2 months and is committed to
preventing another civil war. Just days ago, he told his people,
"Even if they kill 1,000 of us, we will not use our weapons against
them."
He also added, "We have the political, popular and organizational
strength to bring down the unconstitutional government at any time.
What has prevented the fall of this government is not the support of
the western powers but the opposition's will to preserve civil peace
in the country."
But it's likely that Nasrallah will not be able to stop the fighting;
already events are beyond his control. Washington is preparing to
open another front in its ongoing war on terror and is looking for a
showdown with Hezbollah. The neoconservative ideal of "creative
destruction" is now in full-flower and has extended the conflict from
the northern tip of Afghanistan to the southern coast of Somalia
swallowing up an immense swath of the Middle East and Central Asia.
This is the "total war" the neocons promised when Bush took office.
It isn't civil war, but the calculated destruction of an entire
region by the imperial powers.
================
Richard Ménec
Bookseller news and more at: http://booksinternationale.pbwiki.com
- Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] Who and What is a "Real Indian"?,
Omahkohkiaayo_ipoyi Mon 29 Jan 2007, 23:40 GMT
- [A-List] Bolivia's Morales: 'This little Indian won't be leaving office',
Charles Brown Mon 29 Jan 2007, 19:35 GMT
- [A-List] You Have To Stamp Out The WHOLE Colony!,
Leigh Meyers Mon 29 Jan 2007, 17:07 GMT
- [A-List] On holidays.. please set nomail,
nestorgoro Mon 29 Jan 2007, 15:48 GMT
- [A-List] Why Fisk is wrong about Lebanon,
Richard Menec Mon 29 Jan 2007, 14:21 GMT
- [A-List] Planning for Metro Detroit Social Forum,
Charles Brown Mon 29 Jan 2007, 13:06 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Squamish Elder Harriet Nahnee Jailed,
bar Mon 29 Jan 2007, 11:06 GMT
- [A-List] African economic enclavity: Remembering Guy Mhone,
Patrick Bond Mon 29 Jan 2007, 09:40 GMT
- [A-List] Global Warming: The vicious circle,
Bill Totten Mon 29 Jan 2007, 09:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]