Re: [A-List] Enbridge plans pipeline to U.S. east coast

[Macdonald Stainsby <mstainsby@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Michael,
These energy corporations do not need pipes to the southern Great Lakes, 
they have the northern ones. Great Bear Lake/the Sahtu is actually the 
largest "Canadian" lake there is.

Two of the largest lakes in the world are in Denendeh/NWT, also 
including Great Slave, which is actually very accessible to the tar 
sands. The rivers around the area are already dropping level 
drastically, and the tar sands have only just begun. Of course, water is 
also needed for mining, and the same part of the world contains some of 
the largest amounts of un mined uranium.

There is enough water, that is, if all life, agriculture, fish and 
aquatic systems do not have to be factored in. If rivers are the veins 
of the earth, the tarsands have to bleed our earth to death, taking 
nations in northern Alberta and nearby first, all of us shortly after.

In fact, a full ten percent of the world's remaining fresh water is in 
Denendeh and the "Canadian Arctic". The lakes of toxic refuse water from 
the tar sands process near Fort Muck are already quite distinguishable 
from outer space. They are also only a tiny fraction of what is being 
planned by all Canadian political parties, all of them silent on the 
complete pointlessness in talking about reducing this and cutting that 
for the environment if the tar sands continue. They are *the* source of 
emmissions already, despite only just beginning.

Water is globally becoming more and more scarce. Allowing the tarsands 
to continue in operation while people are dying without clean water-- as 
always, in the third and fourth worlds-- is a massive violation of human 
rights.

This pipeline to the US East is supposed to be "alternative" to the 
other Enbridge, the one that (on paper) goes from Fort Muck over the 
territory of several nations to the Kitimat/Prince Rupert area of 
British Columbia, where it was to there get shipped out to Asia. Though 
they play the propaganda war by pretending that one pipe is in 
competition with the other pipe (pipelines cause far more deforestation 
than toilet paper and all similar clearcutting), when in fact these are 
nothing but the plans for how to feed imperialism off the bones of a 
dying resource supply.

Because of how the energy netted is almost nil compared to any other 
form of petrol humans can consume now, even before using energy to 
transport the dirty energy to where it will get used, combining that 
with the environmental nightmare these projects are basically leaves 
only the fact that US imperialism needs oil for their wars for oil. This 
massive profit machine is where any smart investor would put their 
money, and where any social justice activist should put their own human 
energy in resisting-- really, all the other social struggles will not 
matter if we have neither water nor air left.

Macdonald


Michael Hudson wrote:
> This makes good sense if Canada also has the US build a pipeline from Lake
> Superior and Lake Erie to Alberta to provide the water to produce the oil
> from the shale. Shale oil uses more water than sand.
>     When the Carter administration planned this, the idea was to close down
> agriculture, quadrupling food prices, so as to pay for higher-priced oil
> with higher-price food. The aim is not to produce more crude oil so much as
> to increase the price of agriculture -- and depopulate the mountain states
> in the process.
>     Michael Hudson
>
>
> On 1/19/07 4:16 AM, "Macdonald Stainsby" <mstainsby@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > Enbridge plans pipeline to U.S. east coast
> >
> > Part of effort to prevent oil sands output from flooding any single market
> >
> > DAVID EBNER
> >
> > CALGARY -- Enbridge Inc. wants to move Canadian oil sands output all the
> > way to the Philadelphia region, and is working on early plans for a
> > $1.4-billion (U.S.) pipeline that would carry domestic crude to the east
> > coast of the United States for the first time.
> >
> > The plan is part of a larger effort by Enbridge to build a network of
> > new oil pipeline connections in the United States so that expected
> > increases in oil sands production do not flood any single market.
> >
> > The pipeline to Philadelphia or nearby New Jersey is to be quietly
> > unveiled at an oil sands conference today in Calgary in a presentation
> > by Enbridge titled, "Access to markets -- progress and plans."
> >
> > The connection could be in service as early as 2010, the presentation
> > states, with the pipeline carrying 300,000 barrels a day. The link would
> > begin in the Chicago region, which is now the main destination for
> > Canadian oil.
> >
> > Enbridge considers the project a "potential initiative," describing it
> > as "very preliminary," according to company spokesman Glenn Herchak.
> >
> > "Because of the increasing growth of the oil sands, we've seen some
> > market interest [from oil producers] in the potential for new pipeline
> > capacity into the [eastern U.S.] region," Mr. Herchak said.
> >
> > The company has also had initial discussions with refiners to handle the
> > oil, but Mr. Herchak wouldn't identify them.
> >
> > One potential customer would be Sunoco Inc., which owns the largest
> > refinery in the region, a facility in Philadelphia that can process
> > 330,000 barrels a day.
> >
> > ConocoPhillips Co. has a 230,000-barrel-a-day refinery in New Jersey
> > near New York and a 185,000-barrel-a-day operation near Philadelphia.
> >
> > The Philadelphia connection is one of two big new pipeline concepts
> > Enbridge is pursuing. Last July, it said it was looking at a
> > $3.6-billion, 400,000-barrel-a-day line to connect Alberta with Texas.
> > The idea remains in the early stages, Mr. Herchak said.
> >
> > The new ideas to move Canadian oil to different areas of the United
> > States follow the stall that hit the proposed $4-billion (Canadian)
> > Gateway pipeline, which would move oil sands crude from Edmonton to the
> > west coast of British Columbia for export to Asia. After significant
> > opposition from aboriginal groups along the route, as well as slow talks
> > between refiners in China and Canadian producers, Enbridge was unable to
> > get long-term shipping contracts signed.
> >
> > The company has pushed back its in-service goal for Gateway to the
> > 2012-2014 time frame from 2010.
> >
> > To support what Enbridge is calling "a period of unprecedented organic
> > growth," the company yesterday announced a deal with underwriters to
> > sell $523.1-million of new equity, pricing 13.5 million shares at $38.75.
> >
> > The offering was announced after the market closed yesterday, with
> > Enbridge shares ending the day at $39.14 on the Toronto Stock Exchange,
> > near an all-time high of $41.48 reached in December.
> >
> > Enbridge, led by chief executive officer Patrick Daniel, said it wants
> > to finance its projects "in a prudent manner," adding that selling
> > assets to income trusts to raise funds "is [not] realistic in the near
> > term due to market uncertainty."
> >
> > Among Enbridge's list of plans are a $1.8-billion (U.S.) line called
> > Alberta Clipper to add oil export capacity from Alberta to Wisconsin,
> > and a $1.3-billion project called Southern Lights to carry a very light
> > oil called diluent to Alberta from Chicago. Southern Lights is under
> > construction. Diluent is mixed with raw bitumen from the oil sands so it
> > can move through a pipeline to a refinery for processing.
> >
> > Enbridge yesterday also said its board of directors has decided to
> > increase the quarterly dividend by 7 per cent, making the annual rate
> > $1.23 (Canadian), up from $1.15.

--
Macdonald Stainsby
http://independentmedia.ca/survivingcanada
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green
In the contradiction lies the hope
   --Bertholt Brecht.