Re: [A-List] Gulf Allies Support Goals of New U.S. Strategy in Iraq

["Nestor Gorojovsky" <nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Respuesta a:"Re: [A-List] Gulf Allies Support Goals of New U.S"
Enviado por:Macdonald Stainsby
Con fecha:18 Jan 2007, a las 6:02

> Hey Yoshie.
> I have to beg to differ.
> 

Hey all:

I think that we should all beg to differ in a dialectical way.

What would be the use of Israel for the US if there existed no semi-
feudal states in the Gulf or if there were only a few, and the main 
ones suffered some particularly astonishing change? Wouldn't Zionism  
become a useless pain in the ass?

In this case, in the hypothetic case of a series of rebellions in 
these states (which are always more likely than a socialist 
revolution in Israel), things would change a lot, wouldn't they?

I am not predicting anything. I am just begging all of us not to call 
a red herring a clam, while we discard a potential clam only because 
it has been repeatedly used as a red herring _in an entirely 
different context_. The Iraqi stalemate and the probability of an 
attack on Iran with unknown consequences in the immediate future are, 
methinks, an important change of context.

I might be wrong, but perhaps Yoshie was thinking in that sense. 
(Yoshie, up to you to belie me.)

Este correo lo ha enviado
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[No necesariamente es su autor]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
"La patria tiene que ser la dignidad arriba y el regocijo abajo".
Aparicio Saravia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _