hari.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I was flagging quite distinctly, that I will not engage in this manner of switching arguments away from a distinct matter, to my racial background or my alleged sense of grammar. I flag that again. And with that - I end this nonsense on my part. Hari Kumar
Switching arguments?
This is switching arguments: "to destroy any credibility for a socialist path with those who have struggled against Sadddam in his years in power."
Your past attack years ago on Mao as a revisionist is the same argument you use now to attack Saddam now: In both cases, it is out of context.
Henry C.K. Liu
- [A-List] RE: A reformulation (only five?), (continued)
- [A-List] RE: A reformulation (only five?), Sabri Oncu Fri 17 Feb 2006, 22:57 GMT
- [A-List] RE: A reformulation (only five?), Sabri Oncu Fri 17 Feb 2006, 22:59 GMT
- [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), hari.kumar Sun 19 Feb 2006, 00:12 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), Henry C.K. Liu Sun 19 Feb 2006, 00:59 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), Henry C.K. Liu Sun 19 Feb 2006, 01:09 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), Henry C.K. Liu Sun 19 Feb 2006, 02:04 GMT
- [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), Sabri Oncu Sun 19 Feb 2006, 00:48 GMT
- [A-List] Re: A reformulation (only five?), Sabri Oncu Sun 19 Feb 2006, 06:30 GMT
- [A-List] GEEK Assistance Needed, Jim Craven Fri 17 Feb 2006, 01:28 GMT