[A-List] Re: RE: A reformulation (only five?)

[<hari.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Henry Lui:
> It's typical of an Indian communist to accuse Mao of being a
> revisionist. Indian communists are like its colonial masters, the
> British communists, disillusioned and ineffective and remain masters
> only of the Queen's English, except that Indian communists are more
> concerned with learning the correct grammer. The ICP is totally
> irrevelent given their support of India-Soviet geopolitical alliance
> after the Sino-soviet split through the Cold War.
>
> HenryC.K. Liu
>
> See an old exchange below:
> ...Truncated here:

Comment:
Well - I did say I was no match for sheer eloquence.

This was a superb hyperbole.

However:
i) Whether I am Indian, British, Candian - or bless my socks - Iranian - is not, well not EXACTLY germane.
ii) I was quite clearly - when talking about China - referring to the discussion about CHINA TODAY. This is hardly a grammar matter.
I am quite happy debating Mao, but not in this way, and not at a time  when the discussion was about Saddam, or about "CHINA TODAY".

Sabri:
Dog fights are not my speciality.

H