A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] A Chinese Marxism view: Problems ofint'l.strategyfortoday's China
- To: "The A-List" <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [A-List] A Chinese Marxism view: Problems ofint'l.strategyfortoday's China
- From: bar@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 06:18:58 -0500 (EST)
- User-agent: Look WebMail/1.4.1
PS. Or the Cuban deployment of troops to fight the South Africans in
defense of a socialist soutethern Africa in which they won an overwhelming
victory. Is that an example of Cuban imperialism?
Chris
>
> I dont see how a reply to a request by the Afghans to the USSR to help
> support their regime in the face of an assault by the US proxies can be
> construed as "imperialism." The evidence is clear the Afghan war drained
> the USSR and it did not benefit one whit from that war. Are you saying
> that any time a socialist country comes to aid of another and sends troops
> there that it is engaging in imperialism? Then what was the Chinese war
> agaisnt Vietnam in the mid 70's all about?
>
> Chris
>
>>
>> What was the "imperialism" involved in Afghanistan?
>>
>> The Soviets neither exploited nor plundered resources. Nor did they
>> attempt
>> to control the government.
>>
>> On the other hand, take a look at what the United States is after there!
>>
>>>From: "Henry C.K. Liu" <hliu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Reply-To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Subject: Re: [A-List] A Chinese Marxism view: Problems
>>>ofint'l. strategyfortoday's China
>>>Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:11:14 -0500
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Charles Brown wrote:
>>>
>>>>Henry:
>>>>The US was also less exploitative during the Cold War with its allies.
>>>>
>>>>^^^^
>>>>CB: Well, yes, they were in a creative _destructive_ phase in their
>>>>relationship to their colonies.
>>>>
>>>>Soviets didn't seem to have to carry out big imperialist wars as the
>>>> U.S.
>>>>did. This is an indirect indicator of less exploitation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yes, Charles. That is because the Soviet imperilaist phase started late
>>>and came into full bloom in Afghanistan, which eventually brought down
>>> the
>>>USSR.
>>>
>>>
>>>Henry
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
>> FREE!
>> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
- Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] A Chinese Marxism view: Problems ofint'l. strategyfortoday's China, (continued)
- [A-List] A-List] only five?,,
Cseniornyc Fri 17 Feb 2006, 10:26 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]