A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] Myanmar
Respuesta a:"Re: [A-List] Myanmar"
Enviado por:Henry C.K. Liu
Con fecha:27 Jan 2006, a las 2:53
> Myanmar has a history of using outside help to overthrow domestic
> dictatorships. Leaders of the Myanmese independence movement, led by
> General Aung San in the 1930s, used Japanese help to drive out the
> British colonialists. When the tide turned in favor of the Allies in
> World War II, they invited the British back to oust the Japanese army.
>
This behavior strongly reminds me of the attitude of many Argentinean
military during the 30s who, not being Fascist themselves, observed
not without some merry eagerness the German opposition to British
global rule, and afterwards took the side of the Allies when the
Second World War was coming to an end.
And, outrageously enough for more than one on this list, this also
reminds me of the attitude of that Swedish _Labor_ Prime Minister who
(a) allowed Germany to traverse Swedish land against Norway -in the
move he put all the Communists and Left Socialists of the North in
prison so they would not oppose the Germans along the Kiruna railroad-
, (b) declared the neutrality of Sweden, and (c) thus allowed his
country to emerge from the Second World War as one of the most
important -and unblemished- industrial powers.
Modern Sweden (as well as modern Argentina up to the moment when the
1976 coup, which was supported by most of today's "democrats" here
_Communist Party included_) was a child of this "betrayal to
democracy".
It is not a matter of "outside help". It is a matter of how can you
do an independent policy in a weak country that is located at a
geopolitical plate boundary. Marshal Tito did more or less the same
thing in Yugoslavia: he played the British against the Soviet, and
then the Soviet against the British (this, Churchill never forgave
him).
As a final note, I would like to point out, also, that the policies
regarding "independence" of tribal groups are so strikingly similar
to those policies which in South Africa had led to the Bantustans
that it is quite a mystery for me _how is it that Patrick Bond, whose
standing against apartheid I can testify if it were necessary at all_
can't realize that the agreements between the central government and
the ethnic minorities shows the character of those "independentist"
movements.
I mean: while the Pretoria white-only regime fomented "independent"
Bantustans, in a policy already followed by Britain -some examples:
Lesotho, Swaziland, Nyassaland, even (outside Africa) Bhutan, etc.-
the Myanmar authorities arrive at agreements with the military
representatives of the involved populations.
These considerations set my first blueprint of the global situation
in Myanmar. Struggles for democracy cannot be waged _against_ this
basic issue. If you do so, then you end up playing on Washington's
hands.
That is the way I see this issue.
Este correo lo ha enviado
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[No necesariamente es su autor]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
"La patria tiene que ser la dignidad arriba y el regocijo abajo".
Aparicio Saravia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]