Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?

To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
From: Hayduke <hayduke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:25:01 -0800
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6

on 12/17/2005 1:06 PM, bar@xxxxxxxxxxx at bar@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> The Chemical Bases of The Various AIDS Epidemics: Recreational Drugs,
> Anti-Viral Chemotherapy and Malnutrition, Duesberg,P.University of
> California, Koehnlein,C. Kiel University, Rasnick, D. University of
> California, 2003 Journal of Biological Science 28
> http://www:duesberg.com/papers/chemical.bases.html

    Thanks, Chris! I appreciate the reference. I'll study it thoroughly.

    Michael

--
Hayduke Speaks!
http://www.calcentral.com/~mlewis
Hayduke Blogs!
http://www.calcentral.com/~mlewis/blogduke.html

References:
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
  - From: bar

Prev by Date: [A-List] On the Prospects of Using Type AAA Batteries
Next by Date: [A-List] A.N.S.W.E.R. RESPONDS TO UFPJ: OUR POSITION ON UNITY IN THE ANTIWAR MOVEMENT
Previous by thread: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Next by thread: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]