Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?

To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
From: Hayduke <hayduke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:05:05 -0800
User-agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6

on 12/17/2005 12:51 PM, tony black at tal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> To wit: where is the evidence that the virus has been definitively isolated.

    In order to answer this, I'll have to study the literature more
thoroughly than I have this morning.

    As Deep Thought said to Magicthighs, "I'll have to think about it for a
bit."

    Michael

--
Hayduke Speaks!
http://www.calcentral.com/~mlewis
Hayduke Blogs!
http://www.calcentral.com/~mlewis/blogduke.html

References:
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
  - From: tony black

Prev by Date: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Next by Date: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Previous by thread: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Next by thread: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, (continued)
  - Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, bar Sun 18 Dec 2005, 09:45 GMT
    - Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, Hayduke Sun 18 Dec 2005, 10:34 GMT
  - [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, Sabri Oncu Sat 17 Dec 2005, 08:14 GMT
    - Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, tony black Sun 18 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]