A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
It is not understood the same way Ptolemy's theory of the solar system
could not be understood, becuase the hiv theory is fundamentally wrong.
Chris
> There's a lot that isn't understood about how the HIV virus (if it is a
> single
> virus) affects the immune system. But browse through some of these
> articles
> and, indeed, judge for yourself:
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=12524385
>
>
> bar@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Michael,
>>
>> No problem. Believe me I was of the same view as you initially. But the
>> more I read the dicier the pro-hiv theory became. Anyway, you can judge
>> for yourself.
>>
>> Chris
>
>
- Thread context:
- [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, (continued)
- [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
Sabri Oncu Sat 17 Dec 2005, 08:14 GMT
- [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
Jurriaan Bendien Sat 17 Dec 2005, 11:48 GMT
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
bar Sun 18 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
bar Sun 18 Dec 2005, 08:08 GMT
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
paul illich Sun 18 Dec 2005, 09:04 GMT
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
mdriscoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sun 18 Dec 2005, 09:44 GMT
- [A-List] Proletarian Era THE CENTRAL ORGAN OF S.U.C.I,
dnr3000 Sat 17 Dec 2005, 03:31 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]