A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
- To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?
- From: craig duncan <craig-duncan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:22:22 -0500
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 StumbleUpon/1.9995
There's a lot that isn't understood about how the HIV virus (if it is a single
virus) affects the immune system. But browse through some of these articles
and, indeed, judge for yourself:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Display&dopt=pubmed_pubmed&from_uid=12524385
bar@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Michael,
>
> No problem. Believe me I was of the same view as you initially. But the
> more I read the dicier the pro-hiv theory became. Anyway, you can judge
> for yourself.
>
> Chris
- Thread context:
- Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?, (continued)
Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
grok Sun 18 Dec 2005, 10:34 GMT
Re: [A-List] How "scientific" is science?,
tony black Sun 18 Dec 2005, 12:34 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]