Re: [A-List] Why NATO bombed Serb TV

["Nestor Gorojovsky" <nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My apologies to maggie on "us" and "them".  And of course the 
circumstances aroun M. kidnapping won't be discussed as long as they 
have the winning hand in this game.

However, I would like to know what are the opinions on the list as 
regards my general comment, that EU liberals, social-democrats and 
imperialists in general did not care too much about Yugoslavia and 
Milosevic because the whole thing was the last scene in the drama 
that had begun the fateful day when the Social Democrat legislators 
voted the war credits in 1914.  An European civil war of sorts was 
under way, and it closed (for the time being, as Chávez said in 1992) 
with a defeat for us in Yugoslavia.

The Yugoslav issue is also a good litmus test to decide whether a 
Trotskyist is such because he or she believes that the Leninist 
tradition is worth following and fights against Stalinism from 
_within_ that Leninist tradition, or simply believes that the 
Leninist tradition is worthless and is a Trotskyist because his or 
her stomach is not strong enough to accept being termed an 
imperialist.

Respuesta a:"Re: [A-List] Why NATO bombed Serb T"
Enviado por:maggie
Con fecha:12 Dec 2005, a las 6:58

> Nestor,
> 
> My irony appears to have been lost.  I didn't mean "us" on the list,
> but those among "us" who supported the war on Yugoslavi.  I could be
> wrong, but I don't recall Deomacracy Now! being so vehemently opposed
> to that war.  The circumstances around Milosevic's kidnapping are
> never discussed.
> 
> M


Este correo lo ha enviado
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[No necesariamente es su autor]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
"La patria tiene que ser la dignidad arriba y el regocijo abajo".
Aparicio Saravia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _