Re: [A-List] 9/11 news forgotten

["tony black" <tal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stathos,

Don't have the 'sources' off-hand, but...

There is the small matter of the immediately post 9/11 investigations into
the mysterious (and widely publicized) stock transactions which took place
just prior to the attacks,....and which, just as mysteriously, completely
disappeared from media view after members of the US intelligence
establishment became implicated...[I believe it was some university
economics prof from Texas who published some daming reports in this
regard...]

For a thorough review of the highly relevant biographies of the supposed
hi-jackers..and much more...go to www.takingaim.info/ and the archived:
'Smoking Guns of 9/11'

Tony



----- Original Message -----
From: "Stathis Stasinos" <rainy@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: [A-List] 9/11 news forgotten


>  I was writting an article the other day 4 years now after 9/11 about news
> that never reached the broad public. How the public opinion was
> manipulated
> to believe one thing or the other and how the media never contested the
> truth". Im talking about news like these:
>
>
> 23 of september 2001 the BBC states that 4 of the 19 hijacking suspects
> are
> alive and well (then who made the attacks?)
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
>
> Robert Fisk writting about how : "Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, has
> twice been forced to
> admit on CNN that there is "no legal proof to prove the identities of the
> suicidal hijackers"
> (CNN, September 20 and 27 2001)
>
>
>
> The New Yorker - What Went Wrong by Seymour Hersh - 1/10/01
> Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were
> uncovered about the terrorists' identities and preparations, such as
> flight
> manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official
> told me, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately--for the F.B.I. to
> chase." (we all remember the passport of the hijacker surviving the crash
> and falling gently in a nearby road).
>
> I concluded that the details of 9/11 are almost irrelevant (just like the
> fire in the reichstag, or the killer of the archduke ferdinard, or whether
> Rousvelt knew about the pearl harbor). What is relevant is how those
> actions
> triggered what came next and how propaganda is always crude but our daily
> common lives make it believable (are you aware of the anecdote of the
> bells
> of Anvers in the Great War of 1914-1918?).... So I was about to finish
> when
> I saw that all these 3 articles I posted were published from the 20th of
> september 2001 to 1st october 2001. And thats excactly in the timeframe of
> the ridicoulous (given their significance or magnitude) anthrax "attacks".
> (18Sept, 18 Oct 2001). And that has something to do about how those news
> never reached the broad public. I'm not a fan of conspiracies but these
> anthrax "attacks" and the panic in the media are dirty
>
> have you got any other pieces of news forgotten?