Wouldn?t you know there?s always someone who invites himself.
Your ?review? of 7 decades of Soviet history is a little scant on the nature of ?collective property relations? 4 decades after Stalin?s death in 1990-91, when Dudayev?s movement was murdering and putting to flight elected communists and thousands of other ?oppressors? ? something you were denying until quite recently - pulling down a statue of Lenin, and while Basayev was at Yeltsin?s side to put down the ?hardliners? coup.? But that?s ok, I?m all for you economizing.
Like Rozoff I have no investment whatsoever in seeing a lifting of the fortunes of the ?Bonapartist figure who is running Russia today? at the expense of the Russian left. I hope very much for the opposite. I suppose the hope lies in that the Russian left, who opposed Yeltsin?s war in Chechnya, doesn?t ignore or relativize imperialism?s encirclement of Russia using the Axis template of 1941. This is a cheap pose they can?t afford, since this is a real life situation for them.
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: The A-List <a-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [A-List] Jack Straw: Beslan hostage-takers and Nazism are alike Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 15:49:52 -0500
Jim Yarker wrote:What remains to be explained is why if murderous anticommunist despots and mafiosi are to be disdained in Moscow, they should somehow be supported in Chechnya, even after they dismiss parliaments and cancel constitutional referenda. But don't take that as an invitation.
I will take it as invitation. You ask a fundamental question about politics, which is how Marxists see things in class terms. For instance, Trotsky backed Haile Selassie against Mussolini, the Brazilian caudillo Vargas against the "democratic" English and Chiang Kai-shek against the Japanese invaders. All of these figures were just as reprehensible as Dudayev or any other Chechen "bandit". Except for the few brief years before the USSR became Stalinized, the people of Georgia, Chechnya, Dagestan, etc. enjoyed more freedom than they ever have. That freedom was taken away by Stalin and his successors. At least Stalin could be viewed (in the most liberal terms) as defending collective property relations. His CP supporters were understandably ready to apologize for his crimes since they rationalized that this was the only way that socialism could be defended. You have inherited their spin-doctoring proclivities but deploy it on behalf of a Kremlin that is now pushing ahead aggressively with dismantling the last social safety nets that existed in the USSR. What do you get out of it, I wonder. Don't take that as an invitation to answer.
Louis Proyect Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
- [A-List] George Galloway and Mexican fiction, Michael Keaney Thu 23 Dec 2004, 11:26 GMT
- [A-List] US imperialism: everything on credit, Michael Keaney Thu 23 Dec 2004, 11:23 GMT
- [A-List] Oil: high price here to stay, Michael Keaney Thu 23 Dec 2004, 11:10 GMT
- [A-List] China and the US: Competing Geopolitical Strategies, Bill Totten Thu 23 Dec 2004, 01:53 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Jack Straw: Beslan hostage-takers and Nazism are alike, Jim Yarker Wed 22 Dec 2004, 13:43 GMT
- Re: [A-List] The Link B/W Chechnya War and Caspian Oil, Jim Yarker Wed 22 Dec 2004, 13:41 GMT
- Re: [A-List] The Link B/W Chechnya War and Caspian Oil, Michael Keaney Wed 22 Dec 2004, 13:49 GMT
- Re: [A-List] The Link B/W Chechnya War and Caspian Oil, Louis Proyect Wed 22 Dec 2004, 14:10 GMT
- [A-List] Fw: Reportaje de Adolfo Rodriguez Saa y Carlos Kunkel por AlbertoTrombetta, Michael Keaney Wed 22 Dec 2004, 13:31 GMT