|
Special Issue of
the PEACE REVIEW on:
"The Psychological Interpretation of War" Editors, Richard Koenigsberg and Wendy Hamblet
Horace wrote that “it is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.” This thought has echoed through the centuries, punctuating the battle cries of those who dream of righteous conquest and holy war. Warfare has been perpetuated to the extent that struggles on the battlefield have been linked with ideals such as honor, duty, and loyalty.
Yet these words cannot nullify the reality of warfare,
which is death, destruction and devastation.
Gwynne Dyer captures war's
essence when he contends that, by
becoming soldiers, “Men agree to die when we tell them
to.” In the twentieth
and twenty-first century, vast numbers of
civilians have joined
soldiers as victims of war.
Brzezinski describes the last century as
the “century of the megadeath,” estimating that more than 87 million
lives were lost in the wars of the
past one-hundred years. In the First
World War, nine-million people died--more
than twice as many as had died in
wars in the previous two
centuries. Yet the Second World War produced a death toll of
even greater magnitude, estimated at well over
fifty-million. How can we make sense of the
ritual of death and destruction in warfare? What does it mean? What is its
continuing appeal? What does its persistence say about us? This
special issue of the PEACE REVIEW on “The Psychological Interpretation of
War” will address these and similar
questions, exploring the human
tendency to embrace warfare--in spite
of the misery it creates and disillusionment that follows in its wake. Though warfare is often thought of as normative
if This special issue will
raise vital questions relating to the psychology of war. For example, how
do motives such as fear, humiliation, anger, and the wish for
vengeance become linked to the ideology of warfare? If war
indeed is a socially constructed institution, upon what bases do we construct it? By
virtue of what mechanisms do we turn human
"others" into enemies? How do we come
to believe that killing is "necessary" to the creation of a better world? What is the
relationship between the notion of a sacred ideal and the willingness
to kill and to sacrifice one’s own
life? To move toward a world not dominated by warfare, one must do more
than advocate peace. We must begin by
interrogating the sources of war’s appeal. In this special issue of the PEACE REVIEW,
we seek to publish outstanding
papers that explore the mystery of the human attraction
to an institution whose primary product has been suffering and
death.
PLEASE SEND US
YOUR ABSTRACT: Please send a
two-hundred word abstract proposing your essay to the PEACE REVIEW EDITORS, Richard Koenigsberg, Ph. D. and Wendy C. Hamblet,
Ph. D. to arrive no later than The Peace
Review Peace Review is a
quarterly, multidisciplinary, transnational journal of research and analysis,
focusing on the current issues and controversies that underlie the promotion of
a more peaceful world. Social progress requires, among other things, sustained
intellectual work, which should be pragmatic as well as analytical. The task of
the journal is to present the results of this research and thinking in short,
accessible and substantive essays. Recent contributors include Richard Rorty,
Stephen Zunes and Drucilla Cornell. Peace Review Home
Page: http://www.usfca.edu/peacereview/index.htm Submission Guidelines
for the Peace Review: http://www.usfca.edu/peacereview/guidelines.htm
|
- Re: [A-List] Comment on a truthout.org/tompaine.com articlebyRayMcGovern, (continued)
- Re: [A-List] Comment on a truthout.org/tompaine.com articlebyRayMcGovern, Macdonald Stainsby Sun 12 Dec 2004, 23:53 GMT
- [A-List] The Alternative Media, Bill Totten Tue 07 Dec 2004, 23:48 GMT
- [A-List] Bring Them Back, Bill Totten Tue 07 Dec 2004, 23:41 GMT
- [A-List] Very Interesting Investigative Report on 2004 Election by Wayne Madsen, Erik Freye Tue 07 Dec 2004, 21:47 GMT
- [A-List] Call for Papers: The PEACE REVIEW on the Psychological Interpretation of War, Richard Koenigsberg, Ph. D. Tue 07 Dec 2004, 17:02 GMT
- [A-List] Ukraine: people power, but which people?, Michael Keaney Tue 07 Dec 2004, 15:03 GMT
- Re: [A-List] Ukraine: people power, but which people?, Henry C.K. Liu Tue 07 Dec 2004, 15:30 GMT
- [A-List] UK state: Max Hastings on foreign policy, Michael Keaney Tue 07 Dec 2004, 14:57 GMT
- [A-List] US society: NYC's dubious medical ethics, Michael Keaney Tue 07 Dec 2004, 13:34 GMT