A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] Army vs Bush
Far graver than Vietnam
Most senior US military officers now believe the war on Iraq has turned
into a disaster on an unprecedented scale
Sidney Blumenthal
Thursday September 16, 2004
The Guardian
'Bring them on!" President Bush challenged the early Iraqi insurgency in
July of last year. Since then, 812 American soldiers have been killed
and 6,290 wounded, according to the Pentagon. Almost every day, in
campaign speeches, Bush speaks with bravado about how he is "winning" in
Iraq. "Our strategy is succeeding," he boasted to the National Guard
convention on Tuesday.
But, according to the US military's leading strategists and prominent
retired generals, Bush's war is already lost. Retired general William
Odom, former head of the National Security Agency, told me: "Bush hasn't
found the WMD. Al-Qaida, it's worse, he's lost on that front. That he's
going to achieve a democracy there? That goal is lost, too. It's lost."
He adds: "Right now, the course we're on, we're achieving Bin Laden's
ends."
Retired general Joseph Hoare, the former marine commandant and head of
US Central Command, told me: "The idea that this is going to go the way
these guys planned is ludicrous. There are no good options. We're
conducting a campaign as though it were being conducted in Iowa, no
sense of the realities on the ground. It's so unrealistic for anyone who
knows that part of the world. The priorities are just all wrong."
Jeffrey Record, professor of strategy at the Air War College, said: "I
see no ray of light on the horizon at all. The worst case has become
true. There's no analogy whatsoever between the situation in Iraq and
the advantages we had after the second world war in Germany and Japan."
W Andrew Terrill, professor at the Army War College's strategic studies
institute - and the top expert on Iraq there - said: "I don't think that
you can kill the insurgency". According to Terrill, the anti-US
insurgency, centred in the Sunni triangle, and holding several cities
and towns - including Fallujah - is expanding and becoming more capable
as a consequence of US policy.
"We have a growing, maturing insurgency group," he told me. "We see
larger and more coordinated military attacks. They are getting better
and they can self-regenerate. The idea there are x number of insurgents,
and that when they're all dead we can get out is wrong. The insurgency
has shown an ability to regenerate itself because there are people
willing to fill the ranks of those who are killed. The political culture
is more hostile to the US presence. The longer we stay, the more they
are confirmed in that view."
After the killing of four US contractors in Fallujah, the marines
besieged the city for three weeks in April - the watershed event for the
insurgency. "I think the president ordered the attack on Fallujah," said
General Hoare. "I asked a three-star marine general who gave the order
to go to Fallujah and he wouldn't tell me. I came to the conclusion that
the order came directly from the White House." Then, just as suddenly,
the order was rescinded, and Islamist radicals gained control, using the
city as a base.
"If you are a Muslim and the community is under occupation by a
non-Islamic power it becomes a religious requirement to resist that
occupation," Terrill explained. "Most Iraqis consider us occupiers, not
liberators." He describes the religious imagery common now in Fallujah
and the Sunni triangle: "There's talk of angels and the Prophet Mohammed
coming down from heaven to lead the fighting, talk of martyrs whose
bodies are glowing and emanating wonderful scents."
"I see no exit," said Record. "We've been down that road before. It's
called Vietnamisation. The idea that we're going to have an Iraqi force
trained to defeat an enemy we can't defeat stretches the imagination.
They will be tainted by their very association with the foreign
occupier. In fact, we had more time and money in state building in
Vietnam than in Iraq."
General Odom said: "This is far graver than Vietnam. There wasn't as
much at stake strategically, though in both cases we mindlessly went
ahead with the war that was not constructive for US aims. But now we're
in a region far more volatile, and we're in much worse shape with our
allies."
Terrill believes that any sustained US military offensive against the
no-go areas "could become so controversial that members of the Iraqi
government would feel compelled to resign". Thus, an attempted military
solution would destroy the slightest remaining political legitimacy. "If
we leave and there's no civil war, that's a victory."
General Hoare believes from the information he has received that "a
decision has been made" to attack Fallujah "after the first Tuesday in
November. That's the cynical part of it - after the election. The signs
are all there."
He compares any such planned attack to the late Syrian dictator Hafez
al-Asad's razing of the rebel city of Hama. "You could flatten it," said
Hoare. "US military forces would prevail, casualties would be high,
there would be inconclusive results with respect to the bad guys, their
leadership would escape, and civilians would be caught in the middle. I
hate that phrase collateral damage. And they talked about dancing in the
street, a beacon for democracy."
General Odom remarked that the tension between the Bush administration
and the senior military officers over Iraqi was worse than any he has
ever seen with any previous government, including Vietnam. "I've never
seen it so bad between the office of the secretary of defence and the
military. There's a significant majority believing this is a disaster.
The two parties whose interests have been advanced have been the
Iranians and al-Qaida. Bin Laden could argue with some cogency that our
going into Iraq was the equivalent of the Germans in Stalingrad. They
defeated themselves by pouring more in there. Tragic."
· Sidney Blumenthal, a former senior adviser to President Clinton, is
Washington bureau chief of salon.com
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5016994-103677,00.html
- Thread context:
- [A-List] FW: Per capita oil demand and world oil demand growth,
Stan Goff Mon 20 Sep 2004, 20:19 GMT
- [A-List] FW: Lewis and Clark re-enactment protest,
Craven, Jim Mon 20 Sep 2004, 16:04 GMT
- [A-List] Novak says Bush plan is to withdraw,
Stan Goff Mon 20 Sep 2004, 14:35 GMT
- [A-List] Army vs Bush,
Stan Goff Mon 20 Sep 2004, 13:00 GMT
- [A-List] Max Hastings skewers Tony Blair,
Michael Keaney Mon 20 Sep 2004, 11:34 GMT
- [A-List] China & the economics of waste,
Michael Keaney Mon 20 Sep 2004, 10:49 GMT
- [A-List] Iraq: "coalition" case crumbles further,
Michael Keaney Mon 20 Sep 2004, 09:26 GMT
- [A-List] Iraq: the quagmire deepens, the plot thickens,
Michael Keaney Mon 20 Sep 2004, 09:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]