A-list
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[A-List] US imperialism: downsizing in Europe
US plans to cut troops in Europe by a third
By Judy Dempsey in Brussels
Financial Times: February 4 2004
The US is preparing to cut the number of troops stationed in Europe by up to
a third, diplomats said on Tuesday. This will be one of the biggest
reductions since American soldiers were first based there after the second
world war.
Washington will not establish new permanent bases in eastern Europe -
allaying fears that the Pentagon was preparing to punish some countries of
"old Europe" for their opposition to the US-led war against Iraq.
"If anything, the troops taken out of Europe will be sent home," said a Nato
diplomat. "From there, they will be sent on exercises or training missions
to small bases established on a temporary basis in Poland, Romania or
Bulgaria. The old days of the giant US barracks . . . are over."
Romania and Bulgaria will be disappointed by the news, although east
European diplomats played down their concerns. "We will be delighted if we
now get a little base," one said.
The US has 119,000 troops in Europe, 80,000 of which are stationed in
Germany. At the height of the Cold War, Washington had more than 300,000
troops in western Europe.
Russia has warned against moves by Nato or the US to shift forces eastwards
once seven new countries, all former communist states, join the European
Union in May.
In Moscow last week Colin Powell, US secretary of state, told Vladimir
Putin, Russian president, that Washington had no intention of encircling
Russia.
"We are not looking to move bases, of the kind we used to have during the
Cold War, closer to Russia just to put a base closer to Russia," said Mr
Powell.
Diplomats said the Pentagon was set on creating highly flexible, small units
that could be moved quickly to temporary bases. General Jones, the US
commander in Europe and Nato's military chief, wants to create these
structures for Nato as well.
Mr Powell and Donald Rumsfeld, US defence secretary, are not preparing to
cut the number of troops in one sweep.
"The US is still consulting a great deal with all its allies. It has yet to
make the final decision over what bases will be closed," said a German
diplomat.
"Much is at stake. Entire villages have built their future around the bases,
particularly in Germany. You just can't destroy those 60-year-old
relationships."
A Pentagon spokesman denied that any decision had been taken on troop
reduction levels, saying discussions were still ongoing.
Nato officials said the US would not close Ramstein, its biggest military
base in southern Germany, as it is a key strategic asset for US operations
in Afghanistan and Iraq.
- Thread context:
- [A-List] US state: Iraq scandal,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 12:09 GMT
- [A-List] US state: administration fractures over Iraq,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 12:05 GMT
- [A-List] Bolivia: fiscal tightening, political crisis,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 12:01 GMT
- [A-List] US imperialism: World Bank & fossil fuels,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:59 GMT
- [A-List] US imperialism: downsizing in Europe,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:56 GMT
- [A-List] UK state: New Labour succession battle,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:54 GMT
- [A-List] UK infrastructure crisis: railways,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:46 GMT
- [A-List] UK today: Paul Foot's view,
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:33 GMT
- [A-List] UK military: DU's indiscriminate "collateral damage",
Michael Keaney Wed 04 Feb 2004, 11:27 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]