----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 6:58
PM
Subject: [A-List] Fw: Srebrenica Casualty
Number is Challenged by Experts
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: Fw: Srebrenica Casualty Number is Challenged by
Experts
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: Fw: Srebrenica Casualty Number is Challenged by
Experts
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 12:28 PM
Subject: Srebrenica Casualty Number is Challenged by
Experts
Released by: The International Strategic Studies
Association
Balkan & Eastern Mediterranean Policy Council
FOR
IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
CONTACT: Gregory Copley,
703-548-1070
"Official" Story of Srebrenica Casualty Number is
Challenged by Experts
WASHINGTON, DC, September 18,
2003:
On the eve of the dedication of a
monument to Muslims killed at Srebrenica,
in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in 1995,
a group which includes a former UN official,
intelligence experts, and
journalists, released a statement challenging the
official alleged
casualty number of 7,000 victims as "vastly inflated and
unsupported by
evidence.".
They asserted that one-sided interventionist policies
permitted al-Qaieda
forces and radical Islamists backed by the Iranian
clerical government to
take root during the Bosnian war, which clouding
the future of the region.
As well, they agreed that the "memorialization"
of false numbers in the
monument actually appeared to be intended to
perpetuate regional ethnic
hatred and distrust and to deliberately punish
one of the victim groups in
the Bosnian civil war..
Former US
President Bill Clinton is expected to attend and legitimize the
dedication
of the monument at Srebrenica, which was constructed with using
one
million in dollars of US Embassy funds at the request of High
Representative Paddy Ashdown. But former BBC journalist Jonathan
Rooper,
who has researched the events in Srebrenica since 1995, says that
the region
was a graveyard for Serbs as well as Muslims and that a
monument to inflated
casualties on one side "serves neither truth nor the
goal of
reconciliation.".
Phillip Corwin, former UN Civilian
Affairs Coordinator in Bosnia during the
1990s, said: "What happened
in Srebrenica was not a single large massacre of
Muslims by Serbs, but
rather a series of very bloody attacks and
counterattacks over a three
year period which reached a crescendo in July of
1995,." says Phillip
Corwin former UN Civilian Affairs Coordinator in
Bosnia andMr
Corwin is author of Dubious Mandate, an account of about his
experiences
during the conflict. andHe points out that Srebrenica, which was
designated a safe zone, it was never demilitarized as it was claimed to
be,
and that Muslim paramilitary leader Nasir Oric, who controlled
Srebrenica,
launched repeated attacks on surrounding Serb
villages.
He noted: "I was the United Nations's chief political officer
in Bosnia the
day that Srebrenica fell. Coincidentally, it was the same
day that the
Bosnian Government tried to assassinate me as I drove over
Mount Igman on
the way to Sarajevo."
Intelligence expert expert and
strategist Gregory Copley, President of the
International Strategic
Studies Association and the ISSA's Balkan & Eastern
Mediterranean
Policy Council, accusesd the US Ambassador David Donald Hays,
who
serves as Ddeputy High Representative of Bosnia-Herzegovina, of using
the
power of the Office of the High Representative (OHR) governing Bosnia
"to
force Bosnian Serb elected officials to sign a fraudulent document
accepting the official version of events in Srebrenica. The leaders
of the
Serbian RepublicRepublica Srpska [the predominantly Serbian
province of
Bosnia-Herzegovina] invited the office of the High
Representative to join
their investigation of the events in Srebrenica.
Instead they were told they
were told to sign a statement drafted by OHR
endorsing casualty figures they
publicly disagreed with."
Copley
added: "It is significant in that the former US Clinton
Administration
fought this war unquestioningly supporting only the Croat and
Muslim
factions and disregarding the historic alliance of the Serbian
peoples
with the US. Then, after the war, the Clinton Administration failed
to
follow US tradition in helping to heal the wounds of war, but, rather,
perpetuated ethnic divisions and hatreds. This differs from the US role in
all other wars."
"Unfortunately, all of the policies and officials
put in place in the region
by the Clinton Administration remain. The
current Bush Administration has
neglected the Balkans and has, instead,
allowed the Clinton policies to
continue, which has meant that divisive
politics continue. This, then,
requires the ongoing commitment of US
peacekeeping forces in both Bosnia and
in the Kosovo province of
Serbia."
Copley added that, according to intelligence obtained from
Islamist sources,
that the monument is was likely intended to become a
shrine for radical
Islamists in Europe and site for annual
pilgrimages.
He added: "Deputy High Representative Donald Hays forced
the Republica
Srpska Government to issue a statement which accepted the
radical Islamists'
version of the Srebrenica affair, despite the fact that
the Office of High
Representative does not have any investigative
capability of its own to make
a valid assumption on the matter. As well,
the International Criminal
Tribunal on Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague - no
friend of the Serbs - has
itself not completed its investigation of
Srebrenica, and nor has the office
of the Government of Republica Srpska
which has been working with the ICTY."
"Amb. Hays and OHR chief Paddy
Ashdown forced the Republica Srpska statement
merely to ensure that the
opening of the 'shrine' - to be attended by
Clinton - would vindicate
Clinton Administration policies of support for the
radical
Islamists."
Yossef Bodansky, who has written several books on the war
in Yugoslavia and
also serves as Chief of Staff of the Subcomittee on
Terrorism and
Unconventional WarfareResearch Director of ISSA, calls the
7,000 figure
"disinformation" and notes that "all independent forensic
evidence points to
Muslim casualties in the hundreds, possibly the low
hundreds. Continued
emphasis on such allegedly high numbers of Muslim
deaths at Srebrenica also
obfuscates the Muslim murders in that city,
earlier, of Serb civilians."
Bodansky also wrote extensively on the link
between Osama bin Laden and the
Bosnian Islamists in numerous articles and
special reports and three books,
including Offensive in the Balkans: the
Potential for a Wider War as a
Result of Foreign Intervention in
Bosnia-Herzegovina (1995), Some Call it
Peace: Waiting for War in the
Balkans (1996), and Bin Laden: The Man Who
Declared War on America
(1999).
Rooper says that at least one thousand1,000 Serbs, mostly
civilians, were
killed by forces led by Oric who did not bother to hide
his crimes, even
showing videotapes of slaughtered Serbs to Western
journalists.
Meanwhile a group of academic experts and journalists from
the United
States, Canada,
Germany, France, Serbia, and the United
Kingdom has been organized by
Professor Edward S. Herman of the University
of Pennsylvania to examine the
evidence regarding events at Srebrenica in
July 1995 and earlier, how the
media reported these events, and the
political role of claims about
Srebrenica. It is expected that a report
from this group will be available
in June 2004.
Rooper points out
that the 40,000 inhabitants the UN used in July of 1995
before the capture
of Srebrenica roughly matches the number of former
residents accounted for
in the aftermath. A commander of the Muslim-
dominated Army of BiH
(Bosnia-Herzegovina) later confirmed to parliament in
Sarajevo that
5,000 BiH troops escaped largely intact to Tuzla while the UN
registered
some 35,632 civilian survivors.
While the capture of Srebrenica was
reported in July 1995, as it unfolded,
an international outcry only
took place a month later, after Madeleine
Albright, then US representative
to the UN, held up a photo which she said
provided evidence that thousands
of Muslim victims had been buried at field
near Nova Kasaba, 19 kilometers
from Srebrenica. Excavations which took
place following the war,
however, yielded 33 bodies at Nova Kasaba. Two
years after the
event, a total of 400 bodies had been found at 20 sites near
Srebrenica,
an area which had seen bloody fighting over a three year
period.
Instead of acknowledging that there was no support for the
original figures,
Rooper says a various means were used to prop up the
official story.
--Spokesmen for the Clinton Administration suggested
that Serbs might have
moved the bodies to other locations. Rooper points
out that excavating,
transporting and reburying 7,000 bodies was "not only
beyond the
capabilities of the thinly stretched, petrol-starved Bosnian
Serb Army, but
would have been easily detected under intense surveillance
from satellites
and geostationary drones.
--By 1998, thousands of
bodies excavated from all across Bosnia were stored
at the Tuzla
airport. Despite state of the art DNA testing, only 200 bodies
have
been linked to Srebrenica.
--Around three thousand3,000 names on a list
of Srebrenica victims compiled
by the Red Cross matched voters in the
Bosnian election in 1996. "I pointed
out to the OSCE that there had
either been massive election fraud or almost
half the people on the ICRC
missing list were still alive," says Rooper.
"The OSCE finally responded
that the voting lists had been locked away in
warehouses and it would not
be possible for them to investigate."
The inflated Srebrenica
statistics are part of a larger picture that
intelligence experts such as
Bodansky and Copley find troubling. They say US
policy makers have been
slow to recognize that Bosnia is viewed as a
strategic base for operations
in Europe by al-Qaieda and the HeizboAllah.
In 1993, when the
Clinton Aadministration was strongly backing the Muslim
President of
Bosnia, Alija Izetbegovic, Osama Bin Ladin was regular visitor
to his
office, according to Renate Flottau of the German weekly, Der
Spiegel. The
Bosnian daily, Dani, reported that the Vienna Embassy of BiH
issued a
passport to Bin Ladin in 1993.
As special report by Copley, issued
Tuedsay, September 16. 2003. noteds that
BiH Bosnia-Herzegovina Ambassador
Huso Zivalj, who issued the passport to
Bin -Ladin, later served as
Bosnian Ambassador to the United Nations in
September 11. "It is
becoming increasingly clear that the movement of
Zivalj to the New York
post just before (and his departure just after) the
September
11,2001 attacks was not coincidental."
"To refer to US Bosnia policy as
a success story is to disregard substantial
evidence to the contrary.,
iInstead of misplaced symbolism in Srebrenica, US
policy makers need to
take a hard look at assumptions that which have guided
our US actions in
the region," says Copley said.
Ends
PUBLIC
DISCLAIMER:
Unless specifically
noted, the views expressed through various news items received are not
necessarily the views of the Serbian Unity Congress. The same are posted under
fair use provision for education and public information.